Search for: "LaBelle v. LaBelle"
Results 5381 - 5400
of 12,193
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Feb 2011, 4:30 am
A few weeks ago, we commented upon the recent Florida case of Farias v. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 9:15 pm
(Although I can personally confirm that LV lawyers can be charming individuals with fully functioning senses of humor, and probably even love puppies, protecting a famous trademark can be an unforgiving task, especially when the label's designer is a bit of a free spirit.)$300,000 legal bill or not, Pamela would do it all again. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 4:27 pm
Jansen also referred to the judgment in Ruusunen v. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 12:00 pm
In Lance v. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 10:36 am
Id. at 4-5, 7, 20-22.FDA PMA involves rigorous review of the adequacy of product labeling/warnings. [read post]
9 Mar 2008, 2:28 pm
The judgment in Case C-244/06 Dynamic Medien Vertriebs GmbH v. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 2:34 pm
Last month, in Riegel v. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 11:36 am
Our legislature unequivocally has expressed a policy of deference to the federal scheme in the area of drug labeling, and we can ascertain no reason not to extend that policy to civil cases raising misbranding claims.White v. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 3:27 am
These are not controversial observations: see Customs and Excise Commissioners v A [2002] EWCA Civ 1039 [2003] Fam 55; Bekoe v Broomes [2005] UKPC 39; Argos Ltd v Office of Fair Trading [2006] EWCA Civ 1318; [2006] UKCLR 1135. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 5:00 am
See AstraZeneca LP v. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 7:07 am
In Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 4:14 am
[iv] [v] One of these chemicals, 4-phenylcyclohexene (4-PC), is mainly responsible for the odour of new carpets. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 6:55 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum and Mohamad v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 2:04 pm
See Johnson v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 3:34 am
Never Too Late 70 [week ending on Sunday 1 November] – Case T-309/13 Enosi Mastichoparagogon Chiou v OHIM, Gaba International Holding GmbH | Sixteen millions IPKats | Tomaydo-Tomahhdo LLC v George Vozray et al | Lookalike packaging | Parasite copying | 3D printing | Labouring the point? [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 8:15 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 6:33 pm
I have previously commented on Sorrell v. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 6:47 am
As blogmeister Jeremy reported earlier this month, Mr Justice Arnold granted an injunction against Sandoz who were launching a full-label product, notwithstanding that he had considered the patent invalid in the decision now known as Warner-Lambert V (see posts here, here and here), because he had given permission to appeal and so there was a possibility that the Court of Appeal would find the patent valid.That decision contained two other interesting pieces of information,… [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 4:21 am
Ultrasun AG v. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
In Washington Post v. [read post]
