Search for: "Little v State"
Results 5381 - 5400
of 26,849
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2019, 2:00 am
Amling v. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 7:17 pm
Our earlier post sets the stage for the case argued today before the SCOTUS; a case straight out of New York City.This recent case, known as New York State Rifle and Pistol Owners v New York City, involves a relatively strict local ordinance banning transportation of personally owned firearms within the city. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 1:38 pm
It did shed light, but only a little. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 10:53 am
There were relatively few clues as to how the justices might rule on the merits if they decide that the case is not moot, if only because so little of the argument time was devoted to the question of whether the transport ban violated the Second Amendment. [read post]
1 Dec 2019, 8:49 am
Case citation: King v. [read post]
27 Nov 2019, 6:43 am
We have little trouble concluding that Fabricio’s complaint sufficiently alleges protected conduct and, in light of Officer Long’s alleged comments, a causal connection between that conduct and the action alleged to have been retaliatory. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 1:38 pm
See this post.Despite history and widespread usage of "manner of execution" and "method of execution" as synonymous, Judge Chutkan decided that "manner" includes all the details of the state's procedure, down to such things as catheter insertion.If upheld, that would be a neat little Catch-22 preventing enforcement of the federal death penalty in many states. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 1:25 pm
Mohamed v Hammersmith and Fulham London Borough Council (2002) 1 AC 547, Omar v Westminster City Council (2008) HLR 36 (our report), Abed v City of Westminster (2011) EWCA Civ 1406 (our report), and Temur v Hackney LBC (2014) HLR 39 (our report) had all variously held that the facts relevant at review were those that pertained at the date of the review, not at the date of the original decision. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 1:12 pm
Virtually identical to the two cases here is the high court's unanimous decision in Knowles v. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 12:50 pm
FEC, 572 U.S. 185 (2014) (aggregate statutory limit on political donations did little to prevent quid pro quos); Skilling v. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 10:42 am
The brief by the United States disagrees, and so do I. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 6:27 am
In Comm. of the Judiciary v. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 2:54 pm
Where We Started: Energizer In Energizer Battery, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 2:54 pm
Where We Started: Energizer In Energizer Battery, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 11:17 am
Judge Kethledge and Judge Stranch both dissented in part to the court’s opinion (Hudson v. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 10:33 am
The issue arose in Gundy v. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 10:29 am
Kohl v. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 6:00 am
In Brown v. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 2:14 am
Were these cut off, there would be little left to feed an ocean with many inlets and no outlets. [read post]
