Search for: "M. B.1."
Results 5381 - 5400
of 13,696
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2016, 7:35 am
Factor 2 is indistinguishable from 1: adequacy of remedy at law. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 5:34 am
I'm fine. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 9:40 am
Session 1, cont’dMid-Point Discussants: Mark Janis: The functionality doctrine is not good at doing the work we’re expecting it to do, both in trade dress and design patents. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 9:37 am
With no appellate case on point, I’m inclined to say it’s an open question. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 9:37 am
With no appellate case on point, I’m inclined to say it’s an open question. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 7:38 am
Trademark Scholars’ Roundtable, Boston University Session 1: Product Design Protection and Trademark First PrinciplesGiven what we know about the costs and benefits of using trademark/unfair competition law to protect product design, is the whole enterprise worth the candle? [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 5:51 am
And here is our reply to that: B. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 6:06 pm
President Lyndon B. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 2:49 pm
The jury returned a verdict finding the defendants liable under FIRREA, and the federal district judge imposed civil penalties of $1.27 billion on Countrywide and $1 million on a company executive. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 12:36 pm
Yelp.com is ordered to remove all reviews posted by AVA BIRD under user names ‘Birdzeye B. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 6:36 am
Anderson Ralph M. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 7:33 pm
There are several applicable hearsay exceptions, including: the statement was an excited utterance under FRE 803(2) or, the unavailable victim made the statement under belief of impending death under FRE 804(b)(2). [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 4:00 am
From SSRN:Craig B. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 1:45 am
Adrian Lobsiger hat die Schweiz seit dem 1. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 3:54 pm
I’m not holding my breath. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 6:33 am
Ehrlich, and Susanna M. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 4:00 am
Can., 2011-01-20), 2011 CSC 1, SOQUIJ AZ-50711412, 2011EXP-309, J.E. 2011-167, [2011] 1 R.C.S. 3, invoqué par l’appelant, l’appelante faisait des ventes à partir des États-Unis, livrait à des médecins canadiens et se faisait payer en dollars américains par messagerie ou par la poste à ses bureaux du New Jersey; elle avait cependant obtenu un brevet canadien pour le Thalomid, conformément à… [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 1:50 pm
§ 2B1.1(b)(1)(H). [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 5:23 am
Laidlaw Energy Group, Inc. and Michael B. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 5:12 pm
Questions concerning issues addressed in this memorandum should be directed to: Susanna M. [read post]
