Search for: "MATTER OF B T B" Results 5381 - 5400 of 19,798
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2019, 6:05 am
The matter was subsequently brought before the EU General Court, where Mr Carlos Moreira argued that Board’s decision should be annulled and that the EUTM should be declared valid. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 1:25 am by Roel van Woudenberg
Main request: Articles 100(b) and 83 EPCFor the following reasons, the requirements of Article 83 EPC are fulfilled:[...]3. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 9:56 pm by Dennis Crouch
[Regarding step two:] [B]y the ’150 patent’s own terms, the claims do not recite any non-conventional equipment. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 11:58 am by Vishnu Kannan
Collaborates with GS Communication staff on matters pertaining to public/private events and GS Development staff on matters pertaining to donor proposals. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 8:19 am by Dennis Crouch
The dissent’s policy argument is hard to follow: [T]he statutes help maintain a robust patent system in another way: They allow B, a patent holder who might be sued for infringing A’s (related) patent, to protect B’s own patent by more easily proving the invalidity of A’s patent. [read post]
8 Jun 2019, 5:43 am by Joel R. Brandes
In addition, the plaintiffs submission of a verified complaint was sufficient to satisfy the requirement to demonstrate a [potentially] meritorious cause of action.Absent statute, party can’t be held in Civil Contempt under Judiciary Law  753[A][3] for nonpayment money where enforcement can be accomplished through judgment executionIn Matter of Lew v Sobel, ‑‑‑ N.Y.S.3d ‑‑‑‑, 2019 WL 2202453, 2019 N.Y. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 3:32 pm by Dennis Crouch
” The Government brief acknowledges that Section 122(b) states flatly that a provisional application “shall not be published. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Likewise, if a university announces that it is expressing disapproval of the military's Don't-Ask-Don't-Tell policy by excluding the military from on-campus recruiting, that announcement offers no basis for applying First Amendment scrutiny to this exclusion. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 7:07 am by David M. Benenfeld, P.A.
Because they don’t require an inquiry into fault, the damages should be covered no matter who caused the accident. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 6:00 am by MBettman
(B)(2) A person authorized to designate a dog as dangerous shall notify the owner of the designation and the owner shall have an opportunity to appeal that designation by hearing. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 2:00 am by Salvi, Schostok & Pritchard P.C.
“It doesn’t matter if you have the greatest surgeon in the world, if you get an infection or there’s an error in the medications you’re given, you’ll be harmed or even killed from those problems. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 10:20 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Court disagreed: it wasn’t commercial speech b/c there were no buying terms in the press release. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 10:19 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Mandatory/conditional disclosures (if you say A, you must also say B; A means X) require justification, but should not be open season. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 10:16 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Biggest internal inconsistency is treatment of Casey: Bambauer can’t see daylight b/t disclosures required of abortion providers under Casey and disclosures unconstitutional in NIFLA. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 4:12 am by Courtenay C. Brinckerhoff
Gen– Probe Inc. for the proposition that “the written description requirement … is [not] necessarily met as a matter of law because the claim language appears in ipsis verbis in the specification. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 8:48 am by Eric Goldman
To do so, we must publicly share information about what we’re doing and the many reasons it can’t be done perfectly. 5) Our community lacks sufficient infrastructure. [read post]