Search for: "Mark I. Congress"
Results 5381 - 5400
of 7,022
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2020, 6:00 am
And I agree. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 12:30 pm
Dissent: This refusal is "astonishing," and "I am, frankly, astounded. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
In today’s column, I evaluate the theory and its use in the Supreme Court. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 3:50 pm
" As for the first concern, can Congress really be further shamed or embarrassed at this point? [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 5:50 am
Congress also legislates the structure and resources of the State Department. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 7:47 am
GM spokesperson Alan Adler comments, “I have no details,” only divulging that “I’m sure somebody knows. [read post]
23 Oct 2016, 3:54 pm
And Article V enables the states, by “the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States,” to require Congress to call a Constitutional Convention. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 6:05 am
Supreme Court – could influence the results of this imminent election before voters mark a single ballot. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 11:57 am
Step one assesses whether Congress, in enacting legislation, has spoken unambiguously about an issue within the statute itself. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 11:57 am
Step one assesses whether Congress, in enacting legislation, has spoken unambiguously about an issue within the statute itself. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 8:34 pm
Like I said: Catch-22. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 9:18 am
I. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 1:22 pm
crseidcode=1095 Thu. 11-May-2017 02:00 PM 12-May-2017 Essential Practitioner Update Parts I & II 2017 - Law Society Skillnet in partnership with the Leitrim, Longford, Roscommon and Sligo Bar Associations - Two day event with three attendance options. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 6:45 am
Paparelli, June 30, 2023 "Many happy thoughts and feelings collided in my mind and heart as I read the June 23, 2023 decision of the Supreme Court in U.S. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 5:46 pm
Based on just my cursory review of Judge Houck's order, I would venture to say that it is impeccable, and not likely at all to be overturned by any higher court.So where does that leave the defendants? [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 7:00 am
As I’ve argued in both published and unpublished work, NATO has a strategy deficit. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 1:22 pm
crseidcode=1095 Thu. 11-May-2017 02:00 PM 12-May-2017 Essential Practitioner Update Parts I & II 2017 - Law Society Skillnet in partnership with the Leitrim, Longford, Roscommon and Sligo Bar Associations - Two day event with three attendance options. [read post]
28 Apr 2019, 7:45 am
Further, if a patent is granted early, it will expire early and the public will gain benefits earlier.The Warner Lambert v Generics case again raised the question of whether a patentee can mark out a field in which he will have protection while undertaking further research. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 12:00 am
[i] Though the capsule was unmanned, the event marked an important milestone in human spaceflight. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 10:25 am
§ 1803(i)(2)(A) or (i)(2)(B), as enacted by the USA FREEDOM Act regarding a novel issue of law for three related reasons. [read post]
