Search for: "Petite v. United States" Results 5381 - 5400 of 12,163
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Dec 2022, 4:29 am by jonathanturley
On December 30, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit handed down a major opinion in in Adams v. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 2:35 pm
Carvin of Jones Day in Washington (30 minutes), for the United States will be Solicitor General Elena Kagan (20 minutes), and for the Board will be Jeffrey A. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 8:04 am
Related: Elena Kagan - Supreme Court - United States - American Needle - Sonia Sotomayor [read post]
7 Jun 2009, 2:15 pm
The "statement of counsel" signed by John Whealan states:Based on my professional judgment, I believe the panel decision is contrary to the following decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States: The Telephone Cases 126 U.S. [read post]
8 May 2020, 3:43 am by Edith Roberts
The justices also sent United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 7:18 am by Daniel Hemel
United States, held that “Chevron appl[ies] with full force in the tax context. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 2:27 pm by Rick E. Rayl
United States, in which the Court was persuaded that a taking could exist for temporary flooding situations, arguably expanding the scope of another leading regulatory takings decision, Penn Central Transportation Co. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 4:05 am
Schwab will likelyseek a stay in the United States Supreme Court as was done by the defendant inBerry v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 4:53 pm by John Elwood
   United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 11:18 am by Karen Gullo
For the brief:https://www.eff.org/document/eff-petition-graham-v-us For more on these cases:https://www.eff.org/cases/united-states-v-graham Contact:  JenniferLynchSenior Staff Attorneyjlynch@eff.org AndrewCrockerStaff Attorneyandrew@eff.org Share this: Join EFF [read post]
16 Dec 2024, 10:12 am by Josh Blackman
The order granting the petition for writ of certiorari is amended as follows: The petition for writ of certiorari is granted limited to the following question: Is interest earned on client trust funds held by lawyers in IOLTA accounts a property interest of the client or lawyer, cognizable under the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution, despite the fundamental precept of IOLTA that such funds, absent the IOLTA program, could earn interest for the… [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 5:00 am
After its February 2008 decision in Riegel v. [read post]