Search for: "ROBERTS V. UNITED STATES "
Results 5381 - 5400
of 9,853
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2011, 3:14 am
The Supreme Court's decision in Snyder v. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 4:07 pm
For the reasons stated below, we AFFIRM. 07a0261p.06 2007/07/11 Parks v. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 4:43 pm
Many of these individuals sought asylum in the United States based on a credible fear of persecution. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 7:46 am
Justice Elena Kagan is not participating in this case. * United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
Originally, the SEC defined and justified the prohibition in its 1961 Cady Roberts decision.[4] The Supreme Court substantially modified the SEC’s definition in 1983 in Dirks v. [read post]
2 May 2021, 9:59 am
Did any lawyers for the United States approve the timing of the condemnation action? [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 5:46 am
” At Mens Rea, the blog of the American Criminal Law Review, William Hornbeck argues that Chief Justice John Roberts should “restore the Chief Justice’s official title to ‘Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 12:56 pm
Murphy was decided with a one-sentence per curiam opinion: "The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit is affirmed for the reasons stated in McGirt v. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 1:38 pm
United States. [read post]
19 Sep 2024, 5:12 pm
The Supreme Court’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2010, 2:46 pm
The SEC, in In re Cady, Roberts & Co, 40 S.E.C. 907 (1961), and the Supreme Court, in Chiarella v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 7:24 am
Where Kavanaugh and Gorsuch parted company with the majority was in their preference for applying the “demonstrated, specific need” standard of United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 11:36 am
This morning, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
23 Sep 2024, 4:00 am
… Borderlines Podcast#125 – Chinese Interference, the United Front, and Visa Delays, with Sam Cooper This episode is a historical deep dive on Order in Council PC 1911-1324, an Order in Council from 1911 which stated that for a period of one year black people would not be permitted to immigrate in Canada because the Canadian government deemed them unsuitable to Canada’s climate. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 12:23 pm
Amex was sued by the United States and several states, who argued that the anti-steering provisions in its contracts with merchants violate federal antitrust law. [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 9:49 am
Given, however, that racism in the United States was largely cured by the Great Society, courts must adopt several principles when examining racial issues. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 6:10 am
The Washington Post’s Robert Barnes explains the rhetorical power of Lochner v. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 11:58 am
Law Offices of Curtis V. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 5:12 pm
Under the Equal Access to Justice Act, a court can award to a party who prevails in an action against the United States the “fees and other expenses…incurred by” that party if the position of the United States was not “substantially justified. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 4:19 am
United States, in which the justices will consider the limits of tax-law obstruction-of-justice charges. [read post]
