Search for: "Session v. State"
Results 5381 - 5400
of 6,592
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2015, 2:29 pm
” To apply for records within the second hop, the government must state “session-identifying information or a telephone calling card number identified by the specific selection term” used to produce call detail records within the first hop. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 2:37 am
The biggest legal news of the week was almost certainly the judgment of the Supreme Court in R (AAA (Syria) & Ors) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] UKSC 42, in which the Court held unanimously that the Secretary of State’s policy of sending asylum-seekers to Rwanda was unlawful. [read post]
22 Jul 2023, 4:45 am
In United States v. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 12:23 am
Douglas Strang, Scottish Legal News: Higgs v Farmor’s School and others. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 1:46 am
The meaning of that provision is yet to be considered by the courts (Note: the Court of Session declined to opine on the matter in Keatings v Advocate General [2021] CSOH 16 on the basis that it was a hypothetical question in that case). [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 1:07 am
The biggest legal news of the week was almost certainly the judgment of the Supreme Court in R (AAA (Syria) & Ors) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] UKSC 42, in which the Court held unanimously that the Secretary of State’s policy of sending asylum-seekers to Rwanda was unlawful. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 11:29 am
Recall that in 2018, in Pereira v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 8:03 pm
The major case in 1981, Cosner v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 9:45 am
V. [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 4:30 am
At the same time, he was putting pressure on the state’s Secretary of State and on the U.S. [read post]
25 May 2018, 4:30 am
Attorney General Jeff Sessions met with EU officials on May 22 to begin this dialogue. [read post]
24 Sep 2020, 9:02 pm
In Reed v. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 9:35 am
The European Union and the United States voted against the resolution, which they thought counter-productive and polarizing; both stated that they would not participate in the treaty negotiating process.[5] Japan and South Korea also voted no. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 8:04 am
State v. [read post]
15 May 2017, 4:47 pm
The Supreme Court has stated in Department of the Navy v. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 6:53 am
The purpose of this Convention is "to notify to other States where a launching State's space objects are located in order to prevent collision" and to make "identifiable the potentially liable launching State for damage cause by a space object. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 4:02 pm
Uncorrected evidence from the 14 November 2011 (PDF): session has now been published. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 5:50 am
Human Rights Committee’s decision in Teitiota v. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 6:27 pm
Walling v. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 10:04 am
, v. [read post]
