Search for: "State v. B. V."
Results 5381 - 5400
of 41,724
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2021, 9:08 pm
In the federal district court case, Kelley v. [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 7:41 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2021, 2:40 pm
” Ermini v. [read post]
23 Oct 2021, 2:40 pm
” Ermini v. [read post]
23 Oct 2021, 11:53 am
Co. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 9:51 pm
In Milkovich v. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 9:30 pm
EST, the Society will host Making Minimum Wage: Elsie Parrish v. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 2:29 pm
Vega v. [read post]
Supreme Court Grants Extra Rapid Review In Texas Abortion Cases, But Postpones Granting Interim Stay
22 Oct 2021, 12:16 pm
Also today, the Court acted in United States v. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 9:16 am
V. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 9:16 am
V. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 7:00 am
(note that under subsection (a), actual nudity or exposure does not have to occur) Under subsection (b), voyeurism is committed when: Person A observed or recorded Person B; Person A secretly observed or recorded Person B; Person B was in circumstances that gave rise to a reasonable expectation of privacy; Person B was:Nude, exposing genital organs or anal region or breasts, or engaged in explicit sexual activity; and The observation or recording of… [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
" Additionally, the Appellate Division noted reimbursing retirees for Medicare Part B premiums is not an improper gift of public funds in violation of Article VIII, §1, of the New York State Constitution," citing Baker v Board of Education, 29 AD3d 574. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
" Additionally, the Appellate Division noted reimbursing retirees for Medicare Part B premiums is not an improper gift of public funds in violation of Article VIII, §1, of the New York State Constitution," citing Baker v Board of Education, 29 AD3d 574. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 4:44 pm
McCann v. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 3:37 pm
Nguyen v. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 12:36 pm
See United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 12:25 pm
Health & Safety Code § 171.209(e) ("The affirmative defense under Subsection (b) is not available if the United States Supreme Court overrules Roe v. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 7:04 am
United States v. [read post]
