Search for: "State v. Doctor"
Results 5381 - 5400
of 9,597
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2010, 6:05 am
The trial testimony by plaintiff and his doctors was at odds with that offered by the doctor who examined the plaintiff on behalf of the defendants. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 3:20 pm
The 1970's Supreme Court case of United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 8:12 pm
The case is Rio Grande Regional Hospital Inc. and Columbia Rio Grande Healthcare L.P. v. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 10:40 am
Reproductive health has been at the center of much litigation at both the federal and state level in the US since the country’s Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 8:12 pm
The case is Rio Grande Regional Hospital Inc. and Columbia Rio Grande Healthcare L.P. v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 5:12 pm
An example of this defense occurred in the case of Harrison v. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 10:06 am
Today, Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania issued a decision in the case of Gahring v. [read post]
25 May 2016, 8:00 am
Kantorowski v. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 1:53 pm
See Johnson v. [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 11:12 am
Improvement and Power District, a political subdivision of the Arizona state government. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 7:35 am
Earlier this year, in Antone v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 3:32 pm
United States, where the U.S. [read post]
12 Apr 2009, 8:40 am
If the doctor will only say that the surgery is possible, then the trial court will likely exclude the testimony as speculative.Bridges v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 4:15 pm
Weisman v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 12:21 am
Notes: The facts in this article are taken from Mueller v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 12:09 am
Moran (2002) -- upholding state laws giving patients the right to second doctor's opinion over HMOs' objectionsKelly v. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 5:06 am
” Gottemoller v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 8:17 am
In July 2011, the Ninth Circuit arguably veered away from Supreme Court’s position in Sorrell in its own holding regarding a related state statute in Breeman v. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 8:00 am
” Id.A second decision, from New Jersey state court in Gaus v. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 2:39 am
Condliff, R (on the application of) v North Staffordshire Primary Care Trust [2011] EWCA Civ 910 – Read judgment A morbidly obese man has lost his appeal against his local Primary Care Trust’s (PCT’s) refusal to fund his anti-obesity surgery. [read post]
