Search for: "State v. House" Results 5381 - 5400 of 28,799
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2007, 10:12 am
Rather, he invites the State to violate two of the most basic norms of a civilized society - that the State's penal authority be invoked only where necessary to serve the ends of justice, not the ends of a particular individual, and that punishment be imposed only where the State has adequate assurance that the punishment is justified.United States Supreme Court Justice, 1990(1)Robert Comer, Christopher Newton and Elijah Page have something in common, aside… [read post]
28 Jan 2018, 11:02 am by Anthony Gaughan
The most important election law case before the United States Supreme Court this term is Gill v. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 3:09 pm by Eugene Volokh
Here's the full context, from White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre yesterday: Q But specifically with regards to limiting these freedoms — I guess my question is: The Supreme Court created this space for the anti-abortion movement at the state level and also perhaps at the federal level to try and restrict this freedom. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 12:21 am by Gene Takagi
Notable Events of the Week: “In a major shift in United States military policy in Syria, the White House said on Sunday that President Trump had given his endorsement for a Turkish military operation that would sweep away American-backed Kurdish forces near the border in Syria. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 6:49 pm
In her state of the state address today, Hawaii Governor Linda Lingle had this to say about the "ceded lands" case, Hawaii v. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 12:01 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
Friedman writes about the state of affairs in eminent domain at the macro level, noting the reactions in state legislatures and the US House of Representatives' current consideration of the "Private Property Rights Protection Act of 2011. [read post]
It was only at the date of the judgment of the House of Lords in DMG (25 October 2006) that it was clear that recovery was possible where tax had been levied in mistake of law. [read post]