Search for: "State v. Husband" Results 5381 - 5400 of 7,276
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Sep 2008, 6:05 am
The Court has, without exception, invalidated rules that enforce de jure subordination of married women to their husbands or that allocate rights or benefits based on "the State's preference for an allocation of family responsibilities under which the wife plays a dependent role. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 6:05 am
The Court has, without exception, invalidated rules that enforce de jure subordination of married women to their husbands or that allocate rights or benefits based on "the State's preference for an allocation of family responsibilities under which the wife plays a dependent role. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Danielle dances suggestively at a bar with a new lover in front of her estranged husband Craig. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 3:20 pm by Patrick
United States and its progeny Debs v. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 9:06 am by ParkerMcDonald
A witness called 911 from Highway 287 near state Highway 360 and reported Layton’s silver KIA driving the wrong way. [read post]
27 Sep 2012, 8:02 am by WSLL
Affirmed.Case Name: DONNA RAY TEEPLES v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 9:30 am by Bryan Johnson
  The Second District held as much in its recently released opinion in Thompson v. [read post]
1 Dec 2012, 1:25 pm by Administrator
  Ivory Coast is not an ICC state party, but acceded to the authority of the court to investigate the post-election violence. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 5:46 am by Robert A. Epstein
  The father's stated basis for doing so was that the arrangement was "not the best, or most fair arrangements for me or for my children. [read post]
26 Sep 2010, 8:40 am by Moseley Collins
The 4th cause of action, specifically states in paragraph 47 of the complaint that it is brought pursuant to Thing v. [read post]
10 Jul 2006, 7:59 am
App. 813, 105 P.3d 44 (Wash. 2004) the Court of Appeals in Washington State upheld in relevant part the trial court's ruling in a case involving an American mother and an Indian father. [read post]