Search for: "State v. Light" Results 5381 - 5400 of 25,970
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2015, 2:37 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
The GAFTA Appeal Board accepted that the contract would have been cancelled because of the embargo on exporting but stated that the respondents were entitled to $3,062,500 in damages in light of the Default clause, sub clause (c). [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 2:21 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
She was only 13 and attempting to cross a relatively major road with a 60mph speed limit, after dusk and without street lights, was not straightforward even for an adult. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 3:35 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
In relation to the arguments concerning the EIR 2004 Lord Neuberger considered that in the light of the wording of arts 6.1-6.3 of the 2003 Directive it would be impermissible for the executive to have another attempt at preventing disclosure, and therefore EIR 2004, reg 18, is incompatible with art 6 of the Directive. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 1:28 pm by Calvin Massey
  But unlike Loving v, Virginia, where the right to marry was deemed constitutionally fundamental, and the state impediment to marriage was based on race, already a criterion that was presumptively unlawful, the Court has never said that sexual orientation was, by itself, an illegal criterion. [read post]