Search for: "State v. P. B."
Results 5381 - 5400
of 6,786
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2010, 5:00 am
June 15, 2010).We’re particularly pleased with Gibson because it dispatched one of our longest-standing bête noirs – market share liability. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 2:40 pm
This willingness of states and other public organs to delegate is especially potent with respect to rules states are unwilling or incapable of adopting through traditional assertions of public authority. [read post]
18 May 2016, 8:19 am
§ 282(b)(2)) Vermont v. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 9:20 am
B (Auditor Letter), Docket Entry 27. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 11:31 am
Gratz: counternotices v. notices. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 9:27 am
” (Id. p. 3.) [read post]
31 Oct 2020, 7:39 am
The stocks may be listed in Schedule B later in the tax return. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 4:00 am
In R. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 8:00 am
Protocol I, article 50(3); ICTY Prosecutor v. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 1:21 pm
P. 23(b)(3). [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 6:39 pm
Buie, No. 070258 Sentence of fifteen years for being a felon in possession of a firearm is affirmed where: 1) because the maximum penalty for the offense to which defendant pleaded guilty was ten years or more under state statute, defendant's state felony narcotics conviction qualified as a "serious drug offense" under the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA); and 2) defendant's allegation that he was deprived of counsel at his plea hearing did not state a… [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 11:06 am
Parker v. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 5:19 am
b. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 8:08 am
See, e.g., Troxel v. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 1:58 pm
Sixteen years later, in his dissent in Bush v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 5:45 pm
In ECR Pharmaceuticals v. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 6:55 am
However, the EEOC disagreed, relying on the district’s prior decision in EEOC v. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 9:01 am
” Paulino v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 8:54 pm
California (1960) and McIntyre v. [read post]
14 Jul 2024, 10:30 pm
The answer – according to settled case law – is that the term ‘Member States’ refers to ‘government authorities of the Member States’ (see, for example, Région wallonne v Commission (para. 6.)). [read post]
