Search for: "State v. Person" Results 5381 - 5400 of 76,236
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jul 2021, 7:07 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Defendant wins the appeal.Defendant wins because settled Supreme Court authority, Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 12:07 pm
" On December 19, 2008, the Fourth Appellate District of the California Court of Appeal in Party City v. [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 7:18 am by Kristina Araya
In People v Collins, the court of appeals held that Michigan courts have jurisdiction over “victimless” offenses committed by non-Indians on Indian lands located within the state. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 2:50 am by Walter Olson
Listen here: Tags: Article V, live in person, on TV and radio Last week’s debate: Article V convention to propose constitutional amendments is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 1:51 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
This is particularly important where a tort permits recovery for pure economic loss and by persons other than the immediate victim of the wrongful act. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 2:24 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Register would do a disservice to public if it failed to recognize the true state of affairs. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 12:25 am by Florian Mueller
Qualcomm opinion, and even though the Supreme Court held the Apple v. [read post]
19 Oct 2016, 2:34 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The court found that denial of citizenship could fall within the ambit of art 8, where it had an important effect on a person’s identity. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 6:30 am by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
Since the Supreme Court found in 1977 in Bates v. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 7:46 am by David Rossmiller
  Now, it should be said at this point, that not every state has a case like Partridge, and courts in those states may not buy arguments in the liability context based on the reasoning of Partridge, as I have personally found out. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 7:46 am
  Now, it should be said at this point, that not every state has a case like Partridge, and courts in those states may not buy arguments in the liability context based on the reasoning of Partridge, as I have personally found out. [read post]