Search for: "State v. Roberts" Results 5381 - 5400 of 16,750
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2015, 1:10 pm by Lindsay Stafford Mader
The court will convene April 28 to hear oral arguments in four cases challenging state bans on same-sex marriage. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 6:24 am
As support for this conclusion, the Court referred to the plain and ordinary meaning of "complaint", how workplace safety laws have been interpreted in other states, how the federal workplace safety law has been interpreted and finally to a prior decision by the Kentucky Court of Appeals, Terminix Int'l, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 4:02 am by Amy Howe
United States with his opinion in the challenge to the Affordable Care Act’s individual mandate; in both cases, Root suggests, Roberts “craft[ed] a saving construction that cabined the Court’s ruling and avoided a broader constitutional showdown. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 8:01 am
Ainsa, Jr. of El Paso, Texas, arguing for petitioner, began by appealing to the Court's prior decision in United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 8:13 am by Fred Yarger
He filed an amicus brief for the state in support of the church in Trinity Lutheran v. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 2:57 am
Some time ago I had talked about the case of Jacobson v Katzer, a very interesting ruling from the United States that in my view had made the argument that open source licences are contracts, and therefore breach of licence should be pursued as breach of contract.As I wrote before, the case involved Robert Jacobsen, an open source developer participating in an open source project called Java Model Railroad Interface (JMRI), which is a model train software released it… [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 11:32 am by Justin Riemer
Justin Riemer is Chief Counsel of the Republican National Committee, which filed an amicus brief in support of the state in Rucho v. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
Sellers, which asks when a federal court should “look through” a summary state-court ruling to review the last reasoned state-court decision. [read post]