Search for: "State v. State" Results 5381 - 5400 of 258,426
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2019, 2:48 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Lord Reed and Lord Kerr dissented stating that the critical factors in the ECtHR decision of Allen should have been followed and consequently it is necessary for the Secretary of State to examine the judgment of the Court of Appeal to determine whether the criteria of s 133 were satisfied. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 10:41 am by Staff
In order to keep his position on various medical association boards and continue interacting with the State Legislative Affairs Committee on medical issues, it was necessary to have his conviction set aside. [read post]