Search for: "Superior Court of California"
Results 5381 - 5400
of 10,169
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2012, 3:19 pm
Superior Court (Di Marco), 114 Cal.App.4th 881 (2003). [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 2:19 pm
Superior Court (Di Marco), 114 Cal.App.4th 881 (2003). [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 2:19 pm
Superior Court (Di Marco), 114 Cal.App.4th 881 (2003). [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 2:19 pm
Superior Court (Di Marco), 114 Cal.App.4th 881 (2003). [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 11:37 am
Superior Court, 2012 WL 1950184, the California Court of Appeal, Third District, a juror was accused of engaging in misconduct by posting to a social network about jury duty during the pendency of the trial. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 10:04 am
The couple is currently free on $20,000 bail and both are set for arraignment next month in Orange County Superior Court. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 8:00 am
Superior Court (2012) 53 Cal.4th 1004 (discussed here): Brinkley v. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 5:11 pm
The Court began by reviewing unconscionability law in California and by holding that "Concepcion ... [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 3:06 pm
" Presiding Judge Lee Smalley Edmon said it was one of the saddest days in the history of the Los Angeles Superior Court. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 3:06 pm
" Presiding Judge Lee Smalley Edmon said it was one of the saddest days in the history of the Los Angeles Superior Court. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 12:34 pm
Who says the California Supreme Court can't be short and to the point? [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 12:20 pm
Superior Court.) [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 5:39 pm
Superior Court (2006) 139 Cal.App.4th 1423, 1433 [describing Wikipedia as “a well-known cooperative encyclopedia”].) [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 10:22 am
Two weeks after MacGinnis died, Dahl opened probate proceedings in Los Angeles Superior Court and failed to identify Beckwith as an interested party. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 3:08 pm
Stein then filed a wrongful termination lawsuit before the Los Angeles County Superior Court against the Charter Oak Unified School District. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 2:58 pm
After the Supreme Court’s [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 7:17 am
The entire agreement was non-negotiable and difficult for the average consumer to understand, and the title company was in a superior bargaining position. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 2:00 am
Superior Court, 51 Cal. 3d 335, 343 (1990). [read post]
17 Jun 2012, 9:00 pm
The California Supreme Court reversed, reasoning that the Court of Appeals reliance on Azusa was misplaced. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 2:38 pm
Superior Court (2005) 127 Cal.App.4th 197, 213-214.) [read post]
