Search for: "Test Plaintiff"
Results 5381 - 5400
of 21,970
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2019, 12:44 pm
The conservatives are skeptical of the so-called "Lemon test," while Justices Breyer and Kagan would like to keep it. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 10:53 am
Heavlin, 136 Ohio App.3d 719, 737 N.E.2d 989 (7th Dist.2000) (Willful and wanton standard applies during course of emergency run; negligence test applies to pre-emergency call circumstances such as failure to maintain a pursuit policy and furnish necessary training to the officers.) [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 9:05 am
” At the same time, Kavanaugh continued, the fact that the Supreme Court has allowed the cross to stand doesn’t mean that the plaintiffs can’t pursue other options to have the cross taken down. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 8:54 am
Article III requires federal courts to hear only cases that where the plaintiff has a "concrete and particularized" injury, and here, the plaintiff is merely an "offended observer. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 11:22 am
The plaintiff hired William Kitzes, J.D. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 1:32 pm
Plaintiffs in the first suit, Kurd v. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 11:16 am
Plaintiff sued the county over police misconduct. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 9:57 am
Superior Court (2018) 4 Cal.5th 903, and its potential effect on public employers.1 In Dynamex, the Court held that employers must meet the various minimum wage, overtime, and meal and rest break requirements in the occupational wage orders adopted by the California Industrial Welfare Commission for every worker – even those classified as independent contractors – unless the employer satisfies the three-part “ABC test. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 8:00 am
Here the defendants proffered a special interrogatory that was intended to test the foreseeability aspect of a proximate cause. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 6:42 am
Over the last 14 years that I have published this blog, I have compiled an annual review with a list of key Delaware corporate and commercial decisions that have widespread utility to practitioners, especially those court decisions that are not widely covered by other legal publications or the mainstream press. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 9:05 pm
DNA testing on TV shows always looks fast and easy. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 1:04 pm
Background The plaintiffs in Karnoski include nine individuals, three organizations, and, as an intervenor, the state of Washington. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 1:04 pm
Background On 6 June, 2019, the Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data (the “PCPD“) issued an enforcement notice against Cathay Pacific Airways (and its affiliate Hong Kong Dragon Airlines) (together, “Cathay Pacific“) in respect of a data breach concerning unauthorized access to the personal data of some 9.4 million Cathay Pacific customers. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 10:08 am
The head of pathology complained that Levitin habitually requested inappropriate tests from his department. [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 12:42 pm
The test for jurisdiction was whether the restraint had, or was intended to have, any anticompetitive effect on U.S. commerce. [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 12:42 pm
The test for jurisdiction was whether the restraint had, or was intended to have, any anticompetitive effect on U.S. commerce. [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 12:42 pm
The test for jurisdiction was whether the restraint had, or was intended to have, any anticompetitive effect on U.S. commerce. [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 7:53 am
The Ninth Circuit remanded the case back to the district court to allow the plaintiffs the opportunity to plead that irrevocable liability was established in U.S. sufficiently to permit a determination that the Toshiba ADR transactions involved domestic transactions in other securities under the Morrison test. [read post]
15 Jun 2019, 8:37 pm
The Florida Supreme Court just raised the bar on allowable scientific evidence with its nixing of the longstanding Frye test in favor of the more rigid Daubert, the latter followed by federal courts as well as those in most other states. [read post]
15 Jun 2019, 2:24 pm
Green, 411 U.S. 792 (1973) established a burden-shifting framework to test the sufficiency of the facts in plaintiff’s discrimination claim. [read post]
