Search for: "United States v. California"
Results 5381 - 5400
of 13,862
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2015, 10:20 pm
Here’s an interesting new case on the scope of cell phone warrants: United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 5:01 am
The opinion also explains that the images were stored on Mbuzzy's main server in California for username `yngbigirl1. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 2:45 pm
Undoubtedly the state DOJ was influenced by United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 3:31 am
United States, in which the court ruled 5-4 that stock options are not taxable compensation under the Railroad Retirement Tax Act. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 1:56 pm
District Court for the Northern District of California, which had enjoined the construction of a wall along the Southern Border of the United States which was to be constructed with redirected Department of Defense funds. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 8:40 pm
Given that Starbucks has more than 13,000 stores in the United States this isn’t exactly a victory for the disabled. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 6:00 am
United States .v Schultz, 333 F.3d 393 (2nd Cir. 2003); United States v. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 7:35 am
On March 29, 2007, the Fifth Circuit ruled in Regents of California v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 11:33 am
United States, 235 P.3d 42 (Cal. 2010) (The statutory phrase “keep the premises safe” is an apt description of the property-based duties underlying premises liability, a liability category that does not include vehicular negligence.) [read post]
11 May 2018, 9:32 pm
30 days after Samsung obtained an antisuit injunction against Huawei's enforcement of two standard-essential patent (SEP) injunctions granted by a Chinese court, Huawei filed an appeal and notified the United States District Court for the Northern District of California accordingly:The above screenshot is from an automated notification email to those following the case, which is one of half a dozen cases on my N.D. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 10:00 am
In Sharpe v. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 11:38 am
But the trial judge nonetheless allows the jury -- including Juror No. 6 -- to render a guilty verdict on two of the four counts.The United States Supreme Court has held that it's not reversible error to accept a verdict from a juror who gave "honest though mistaken" answers during voir dire. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 6:53 am
(Photo credit: ElectronicFrontierFoundation)The Electronic Frontier Foundation ("EFF"), a nonprofit online free speech advocate, wants a California federal court to retain a defamation suit into which a federal judge in Illinois has inserted himself, the Courthouse News Service reports.The United States District Court for the Central District of California is where plaintiffs last month initially filed an 18-page Complaint alleging, among other counts,… [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 8:18 am
Perry (the challenge to California’s ban on same-sex marriage) and United States v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 7:11 am
"The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit having certified to the Supreme Court the following question of law pursuant to Rule 2:12-1:And the Court having determined to accept the question as certified. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 9:30 pm
Former LHB Guest Blogger Mary Ziegler, Florida State University, has published Abortion and the Law in America: Roe v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:12 am
Larue v. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 2:40 pm
Here is a summary of the plaintiff's allegations, from Judge Liam O'Grady's opinion denying a motion to dismiss: Plaintiff is a retired Senior Master Sergeant in the United States Air Force ("SMSgt. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 5:30 am
For example, the court in United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2010, 6:43 pm
Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
