Search for: "United States v. Fields"
Results 5381 - 5400
of 5,962
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Sep 2009, 8:07 am
There is a new Specific Material Designation of "online resource" to be used in the MARC 300 field. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 5:51 am
(IPKat) United States US General Third IP cross-retaliation strike against USA at WTO (Excess Copyright) World Economic Forum survey: US 18th in global IP protection (Intellectual Property Watch) Funds for US State Department global IP enforcement training (Intellectual Property Watch) Changes in USPTO senior management (Patent Docs) US Patents PatentFreedom to offer subscription-based reexam service to attack NPE patents (Peter Zura's 271 Patent… [read post]
12 Sep 2009, 8:24 am
Speaker, that the scope and meaning of the limitations imposed by the first section, fourteenth amendment of the Constitution may be more fully understood, permit me to say that the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States, as contradistinguished from the citizens of a State, are chiefly defined in the first eight amendments to the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 1:27 am
In January of 2000, the Supreme Court of the United States decided the case of Weeks v. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 1:27 am
In January of 2000, the Supreme Court of the United States decided the case of Weeks v. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 1:27 am
In January of 2000, the Supreme Court of the United States decided the case of Weeks v. [read post]
6 Sep 2009, 11:46 pm
The Supreme Court explained the reason underlying the indefiniteness doctrine 60 years ago in United Carbon Co. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2009, 6:40 am
The rule that disqualifies persons who are not 35 years of age from eligibility for the Presidency of the United States is quite hard or rigid. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 6:32 pm
Dickinson v. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 8:03 am
United States, under NAFTA's investment chapter suggest that these issues extend to international investment and perhaps other areas. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 3:00 am
--Court: United States District Court for the Eastern District of PennsylvaniaOpinion Date: 8/19/09Cite: Perry v. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 7:28 pm
She was directly admitted to the medical/respiratory intensive care unit (MRICU). [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 5:13 pm
This issue arose in a case decided by the New Mexico Supreme Court on August 25, 2009 in the case of State v. [read post]
30 Aug 2009, 9:45 pm
United States v. [read post]
30 Aug 2009, 12:58 am
The case is Ray v. [read post]
29 Aug 2009, 3:00 am
The United States Supreme Court has stated that qualified immunity is the norm, absolute immunity is the exception.2 Should that immunity disappear when, in their official capacities as child protection workers, they make knowingly inaccurate or false statements which result in the wrongful removal of a child? [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 7:05 am
The case is Citizens United v. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 4:32 am
United States. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 2:03 pm
In Sinaltrainal v. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 9:00 pm
In that context, the United States Supreme Court has -- with narrow exceptions -- made the benefits of its new rulings unavailable to criminal defendants who have already exhausted appellate relief. [read post]
