Search for: "United States v. Minor"
Results 5381 - 5400
of 7,102
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2011, 7:34 am
” http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/839921.opn.pdf State v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 7:34 am
United States it vacated a Federal Circuit decision and held that when, to protect state secrets, a court dismisses a contractor’s prima facie valid affirmative defense to the government’s allegations of breach of contract, a proper remedy is to leave the parties where they were on the day they filed suit. [read post]
24 May 2011, 3:11 am
More fundamentally, the United States Supreme Court struck down a statute enacted by the State of Washington which granted “breathtakingly broad” grandparent visitation, Troxel v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 1:00 pm
It was Ratified by the President of the United States on August 30, 1939. [read post]
23 May 2011, 12:47 pm
They will decide whether the women can join in a class action as the vehicle for their lawsuit.There have been no blockbuster rulings so far like last term's controversial campaign finance decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 12:36 pm
United States, 347 U.S. 645, 652-53, 74 S.Ct. 826, 98 L.Ed. 1015 (1954)).... [read post]
23 May 2011, 9:15 am
In Khalip v Khalip, 2011 WL 1882514 (E.D.Mich.) [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:44 am
This was the riddle that recently occupied a nine-judge panel of the Supreme Court in R (Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice [2011] UKSC 18. [read post]
22 May 2011, 2:36 pm
Connecticut and Roe v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 3:09 pm
’” Campbell v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 1:33 pm
The latest contribution to the Second Circuit’s reversal docket is a 400-page sentencing opinion from earlier this week, United States v. [read post]
18 May 2011, 5:13 am
” Lluch v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 4:45 pm
§§ 1257, 1291, 1292, or any other provision of law, neither any federal appeals court nor the Supreme Court of the United States shall have jurisdiction, either by appeal or as an original action, over any case in which reimbursement is sought for expenses allegedly incurred in conformity with rules established by a SIMAB. [read post]
17 May 2011, 1:00 pm
It was Ratified by the President of the United States on May 19, 1937. [read post]
17 May 2011, 10:35 am
However, the United States is not a party to that treaty. [read post]
17 May 2011, 9:00 am
It was Ratified by the President of the United States on August 30, 1939. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:05 pm
The majority of the “Rakofksy 74” defendants are scattered across the United States and Canada. [read post]
16 May 2011, 5:21 am
Bodden, 68 AD3d 871, 875; see Matter of Dox v. [read post]
15 May 2011, 11:24 am
United States v. [read post]
14 May 2011, 3:33 pm
United States v. [read post]
