Search for: "Borders v. Borders"
Results 5401 - 5420
of 6,669
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2017, 9:06 am
Citing U.S. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 3:37 am
And it is this unitary constitutional model which is reflected in the terms of the Scotland Act 1998 which created the devolutionary structures north of the border. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 7:10 am
See Young v. [read post]
11 May 2022, 9:22 pm
United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 8:48 am
In one well-known example, DeFunis v. [read post]
7 Jan 2022, 9:34 am
Businesses must back up their words) taking the position that businesses must ensure that environmental claims: (i) are not misleading or likely to result in misinterpretation; (ii) are accurate and specific; (iii) are substantiated and verifiable; (iv) are relevant; and (v) do not include false or misleading endorsements from third parties. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 5:00 am
In West Virginia v. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 1:59 pm
The case is Spittler v. [read post]
2 Jan 2008, 6:49 pm
In his dissent in Hudson v. [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 5:48 pm
Another topic Nimmer addressed at length was the doctrine of first sale, and he was highly critical of the Ninth Circuit decision in Vernor v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 5:40 am
In State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2022, 2:58 am
In April this year, the European Commission passed a draft directive to regulate cross-border SLAPPs – dubbed “Daphne’s law” – as well as a recommendation to encourage EU member states to address SLAPPs at a national level. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 1:55 pm
(Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 12:54 pm
Coker v. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 7:00 am
Malmo Levine; R v. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 5:26 pm
The High Court’s judgment in Schrems v. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court answered that question in the 1898 case of United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2024, 3:55 am
The first Ollman v. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 10:34 am
” Hilton v. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 5:04 am
Supreme Court case construing the act, Sosa v. [read post]
