Search for: "Courts and Judicial System" Results 5401 - 5420 of 26,729
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Aug 2020, 3:14 pm by Throneberry Law Group
The case went through years of litigation, during which time the case was dismissed but later resurrected by a federal court that found that the defendants engaged in systemic fraud in order to derail the judicial process. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 11:51 am by ADR Times
Sequitur, the issue of unilateral appointment of arbitrators has witnessed intense judicial scrutiny. [read post]
22 Aug 2020, 9:40 am by Georgialee Lang
Stewart succinctly writes in “Tangled Webs: How False Statements are Undermining America”: “Our judicial system rests on an honor code: “I swear to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 11:02 am by ADR Times
Sequitur, the issue of unilateral appointment of arbitrators has witnessed intense judicial scrutiny. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 10:44 am by Jon Katz
Fairfax judges this month via a unanimous Circuit Court issued a plan against systemic racism in the county's judicial system. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 6:07 am by Supreme People's Court Monitor
The Belarusian side shared some insights about the Belarusian judicial system, as well as about the judicial reforms’ results aimed at integrating e-justice elements into the process and making legal proceedings more time efficient. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 6:01 am by Ashley Deeks
Courts have developed a system to “push” similar cases to the deciding judge for reference (although judges have complained that the system is not yet precise enough) and a system that reviews draft judicial opinions and warns judges of “abnormal judgments. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 4:11 am by Mark Fotohabadi
One of the main differences between these two countries is that Italy utilizes a civil law system; the United States utilizes a common law system. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 4:51 pm by Eugene Volokh
" Because this common law right is intended to promote public understanding of the judicial process and the bases for a court's decision, the public's interest is stronger where the information is part of briefing on a motion "more than tangentially related to the underlying cause of action. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 1:04 pm by Odia Kagan
A key legal issue in crafting such a system is ensuring that a plaintiff has “standing” to sue, as required by Article III of the U.S. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 1:04 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
The validity of evidence is central to the public's acceptance of outcomes in the courtroom, underlying the very foundational basis for trust in the judicial system. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 12:00 pm by Amy Howe
This post was originally published at Howe on the Court. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 7:00 am by Jean O'Grady
Holland, retired, Delaware Supreme Court, noted the value Quick Check Judicial provides. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 5:01 am by Unknown
If Drum wants to go after federal trust funds because he thinks the general fund is sufficient, does he propose to eliminate not only the Social Security trust funds (technically there are two, the old-age and survivors insurance fund and the disability insurance fund), but also the two Medicare trust funds, the Civil Service Retirement and Disability Fund, the Military Retirement Fund, the Employees Life Insurance Fund, the National Railroad Retirement Investment Trust, the Employees and Retired… [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
In any event, no such evidence was presented to the court at this stage. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 8:00 am by Alexis
Judge David Shakes, who oversees the VTC, once illustrated just how different this court system is from other court systems: “This is a treatment court,” Judge Shakes said. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 4:15 am by Terry Campo
 Thankfully, the days of this ill-defined system, which breeds cronyism, not justice, may soon be numbered. [read post]
We would draw attention to two examples we have noticed, thus far into re-opening: In the Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench, non-binding Judicial Dispute Resolutions have been re-introduced but with the caveat that “all parties must be represented by counsel”. [read post]