Search for: "Crawford " Results 5401 - 5420 of 6,160
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Sep 2007, 8:03 am
Your account of the circumstances behind O'Connor's retirement differs from the one presented in Jan Crawford Greenburg's book, Supreme Conflict. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 3:28 am
Paul Hunt, No. 96,883 (Crawford)Direct appeal; First-degree MurderCarl FolsomImproper venue (several related issues)Improper admission of testimony that invaded province of juryProsecutorial misconduct (personal opinion)Admission of prior bad act evidence without limiting instructionOctober 24-Wednesday-p.m.State v. [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 10:17 pm
You can find the supplemental brief in Crawford here. [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 2:51 pm
., 309 F.3d 404, 414-16 (7th Cir. 2002) (agreement that was mailed to customer and stated the customer agreed to its terms if he enrolled in, used, or paid for services, was binding; vendor had no legal obligation to continue providing those services and therefore provided consideration by continuing to provide the service; customer’s continued use of service constituted acceptance); Crawford v. [read post]
16 Sep 2007, 2:43 pm
  The Supreme Court stepped right up to the plate in 2004 and decided Crawford, a case that effectively prevents many child sex abuse cases from going forward - which, I think, was the point. [read post]
14 Sep 2007, 8:15 pm
The Sixth Amendment's Confrontation Clause, as interpreted by the Supreme Court in Crawford v. [read post]
14 Sep 2007, 7:41 am
  I really enjoyed Jan Crawford Greenburg's Supreme Conflict (link), and so I'm interested to see how Toobin's book compares, particularly when it comes to the Roberts, Alito, and Miers nominations. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 7:08 pm
A concurring opinion says that sec. 1370 should just be struck down as a violation of the confrontation clause, under Crawford (541 U.S. 36). [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 10:13 am
It asks whether the Supreme Court's 2004 decision in Crawford v. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 2:53 am
Why the keynoter for that event, originally scheduled to be ABC's Jan Crawford Greenburg, had to cancel her appearance . . . [read post]
12 Sep 2007, 6:17 pm
It asks whether the Supreme Court's 2004 decision in Crawford v. [read post]
12 Sep 2007, 10:57 am
Tony Mauro reports that Thomas will flog his upcoming book on "60 Minutes" and later appear at a public Q&A with ABC's Jan Crawford Greenburg. [read post]
12 Sep 2007, 9:06 am
If the answer is affirmative, then the court must assess whether that value warrants the risk that the jury will, notwithstanding an instruction to the contrary, use the statement to prove the truth of what it asserts.In a new article, Expert Evidence and the Confrontation Clause after Crawford v. [read post]
12 Sep 2007, 8:22 am
"Momentary Indecision": At her "Legalities" blog, ABC News correspondent Jan Crawford Greenburg has this post providing additional insight into the White House's decision-making process in selecting a new Attorney General. [read post]