Search for: "Degree v. United States"
Results 5401 - 5420
of 6,520
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Sep 2010, 12:20 am
In Sutton v. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 11:25 am
This is the test of Brandenburg v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 8:52 am
Written by Gene Quinn (of IPWatchdog.com and Practice Center Contributor) The United States Patent and Trademark Office has provided an update to its Examination Guidelines concerning the law of obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 in light of precedential decisions from the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued since the 2007 decision by the United States Supreme Court in KSR Int’l Co. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 11:33 am
This was a fairly bold statement by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas. [read post]
5 Sep 2010, 12:32 pm
Lord Denning’s statement on auditor skepticism was recently cited with approval by the Singapore Court of Appeal in United Project Consultants v. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 11:23 am
V. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 5:05 pm
To some degree, everyone may even be right. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 6:20 pm
" United States v. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 11:50 am
Restani of the United States Court of International Trade (“CIT”) on August 4, 2010 ordered the United States Department of Commerce (“DOC”) to forego the imposition of countervailing duties on pneumatic off-the-road tires from the People’s Republic of China. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 11:50 am
Restani of the United States Court of International Trade (“CIT”) on August 4, 2010 ordered the United States Department of Commerce (“DOC”) to forego the imposition of countervailing duties on pneumatic off-the-road tires from the People’s Republic of China. [read post]
29 Aug 2010, 5:14 pm
He disagreed with the majority’s lengthy analysis, considering the result compelled by United States Supreme Court precedent. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 10:38 am
This case had been remanded by the Michigan Supreme Court for examination of Confrontation Clause issues in light of the recent United States Supreme Court decision in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 4:41 pm
In United States v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 11:50 am
" The claim that the 7 ½-foot tall high-power microwave device — dubbed the "Pain Ray" by the media — will cause no injury is highly dubious, to say the least: There is good evidence from the United States military that it is capable of inflicting not only intolerable pain, but death. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 11:29 am
Supreme Court Decision, Lingle v. [read post]
21 Aug 2010, 12:00 am
Before O'Meara's resentencing, the Supreme Court of the United States decided in Blakely v. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 6:15 pm
It’s well worth revisiting the decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the 2d Circuit (the Circuit in which the court hearing Shepard Fairey’s lawsuit against AP and Manny Garcia is pending) in Blanch v. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 12:30 pm
After graduating from high school, plaintiff joined the United States Marine Corps. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 10:53 am
United States. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 3:09 am
” The Sheffield Court turned to the United States Supreme Court decisions in Daubert v. [read post]
