Search for: "Doe Defendants I through V" Results 5401 - 5420 of 12,268
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2016, 5:04 pm by Kate Howard
South Carolina instructions by relying upon the availability of commutation, has decided this question in a manner that conflicts with Simmons; and (3) whether a defendant's Due Process right to a fair trial is secure when a prosecutor with a history of misconduct commits misconduct on several occasions through the defendant's trial. [read post]
24 May 2016, 9:00 am by Steve Vladeck
At its core, and in response to the Supreme Court's decision in Hamdan v. [read post]
24 May 2016, 1:18 am by Jani Ihalainen
Jennifer Witterick, the defendant, after learning about the story of Ms. [read post]
23 May 2016, 1:17 pm
  The judge begins by explaining that[i]n this action, Plaintiff Sun West Mortgage Company (`Sun West’) contends that its former employee, Defendant Miguel Matos Flores (`Matos’) breached his employment agreement and made unauthorized disclosures regarding company trade secrets in violation of The Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, 18 U.S. [read post]
23 May 2016, 6:28 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  If I were a defendant, I would point to this court’s endorsement of Tiffany to justify sticking with the initial analysis.] [read post]
20 May 2016, 1:15 pm by Eugene Volokh
I’m delighted to report that the Michigan Court of Appeals has just upheld a Twitter parodist’s First Amendment claim in the “badass lawyer” case, Levitt v. [read post]
20 May 2016, 9:08 am by John Elwood
Community Bank of Raymore, 14-520, concerns development of a residential subdivision in (I’m not making this up) Peculiar, Missouri (The town motto, also not made up, is “Where the odds are with you. [read post]
20 May 2016, 7:20 am by Amy Howe
  However, I am not affiliated with the firm.] [read post]
19 May 2016, 6:52 pm by Steve Vladeck
” As a result, the Court held that a defendant who threw a Molotov cocktail through the window of an owner-occupied residential house could not be guilty under §844(i) because the house was not “active[ly] used” in interstate commerce. [read post]
19 May 2016, 2:29 pm by Nora Ellingsen
Although not persuaded at the moment to rename the defendant, Judge Waits does agree to look into whether Hadi had been deposed or took an oath in some type of federal proceeding using a different name in the past. [read post]
19 May 2016, 7:29 am by Kent Scheidegger
  "We hold that the guarantee protects the accused from arrest or indictment through trial, but does not apply once a defendant has been found guilty at trial or has pleaded guilty to criminal charges," Justice Ginsburg wrote for a unanimous court in Betterman v. [read post]
18 May 2016, 8:19 am by Dennis Crouch
Post Grant Admin: I previously discussed GEA Process Engineering. [read post]