Search for: "Doe VI"
Results 5401 - 5420
of 5,651
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2020, 8:42 am
The head of the Spanish state, King Felipe VI, represents the unity and continuity of the state’s institutions. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
It does not prohibit the taking of private property, but instead is designed “to secure compensation in the event of otherwise proper interference amounting to a taking. [read post]
31 Aug 2018, 9:14 am
However, the prosecutor does not have to prove that the defendant had any specific knowledge of that underlying criminal business operation. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 8:57 am
John B. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
Doe v. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 8:50 am
This can be very burdensome to the taxpayer since debt forgiveness does not generate cash and the taxpayer may not have other cash to pay the tax. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
It does not prohibit the taking of private property, but instead is designed “to secure compensation in the event of otherwise proper interference amounting to a taking. [read post]
18 May 2011, 1:00 pm
Article 6 bars extradition when the person sought has been found guilty, convicted or acquitted in the Requested State for the offense for which extradition is requested, but does not bar extradition if the competent authorities in the Requested State have declined to prosecute or have decided to discontinue criminal proceedings. [read post]
Arrested for Assault? Why You Need a Skilled Houston Criminal Lawyer When Accused of Assault Charges
31 Aug 2012, 3:20 pm
Additionally, the law does not require the alleged victim to sustain an actual injury. [read post]
19 May 2017, 12:23 pm
ELEMENTS OF CAUSE OF ACTION FOR WRONGFUL FORECLOSURE The elements of a wrongful foreclosure claim are: (1) a defect in the foreclosure sale proceedings; (2) an inadequate selling price; and (3) a causal connection between the defect and the inadequate selling price. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 12:08 pm
It’s time for the seventh volume of Retromark, Darren Meale (Simmons & Simmons)’s rundown of notable trade mark cases over the past six months.Over to Darren:Retromark Volume VII: the last six months in trade marksIt’s now three years since I began Retromark, and we are on to a seventh volume. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 10:37 am
In the case of the CCG, it is a maritime law enforcement organization that does not deny that it is a military force even under international law. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 7:24 am
How does acquiescence work now that the importance of this doctrine has been elevated following the Heitec and Combe decisions? [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 2:18 pm
”[vi] Non-compliance as to any offer or sale in an “offering” gives every purchaser (including Mr. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:46 am
Over the last month, on our New Republic: Security States newsfeed, we rolled out a series designed to explain why fairly allocating the costs of software deficiencies between software makers and users is so critical to addressing the growing problem of vulnerability-ridden code—and how such a regime will require questioning some of our deep-seated beliefs about the very nature of software security. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:14 pm
The Office of Medicaid argued below that if the settlor of the trust can or does use the home, then it is “available,” and therefore per se countable, yet the regulation and its interpretation are not in accordance with federal Medicaid trust law or the Office of Medicaid’s long history of implementing the law correctly. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 2:45 am
United States,[vi] the Supreme Court that the companion mail-fraud statute applied only to schemes to defraud others of money or property, not honest services. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:14 pm
The MassHealth regulation at 130 CMR 520.023(C)(1)(d) itself does not support the interpretation given to it by the Office of Medicaid [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 12:14 pm
Nor does it make any sense to describe a reference made by a court to a suitable institution or person for arriving at a settlement as "judicial settlement", as is done in clause (c). [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 3:01 pm
Does the practice of requiring large firms/companies to have an independent cross-check and not to require this from a small firm/company by referring to the close personal collaboration of the persons involved constitute a case of disproportionate discrimination? [read post]
