Search for: "Does 1 - 33"
Results 5401 - 5420
of 6,150
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Nov 2009, 7:20 am
Only 18 letters (16 percent), mostly from labor unions and public pension funds, as well as RiskMetrics, [2] supported the 1 percent SEC-proposed threshold. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 5:51 am
Trust Provision Satisfactory Needs Attention N/A 1 Trust Name Does the trust document identify the formal and abbreviated names of the trust at the beginning of the document? [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 5:01 am
Like Canada, Israel has also moved away from NASDAQ's quorum rule requiring 33 1/3% of shareholders present to conduct a meeting. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 12:46 pm
On February 1, 1980, Illinois officials notified MITE that the proposed offer violated the IBTA and issued a cease and desist order and a notice of an administrative hearing. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 9:18 am
33? [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 5:00 am
As Canadian corporate governance standards do not set a specific percentage for quorum requirements, the companies that take advantage of Rule 5615(a)(3) have a lower quorum requirement than NASDAQ's 33 1/3%. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 12:56 am
The Clerk of Shelby County shall commence collecting the additional $20.00 alternative dispute resolution fee, pursuant to Indiana Code 33-4-13-1, on September 1, 2005. 2. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 3:15 pm
Eliminate the third year of law school and roll-back, just like Wal-Mart might do, the expected debt by 33%. [read post]
7 Nov 2009, 9:21 am
SEC Litigation Against BofA 1. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 7:30 am
If the jury's award does not meet this test, the trial court has the duty to reduce it ]; Sinz v. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 4:45 pm
Although this observation is correct in itself, it does not lead to the conclusion that the disclaimer necessarily fails for this reason to comply with A 123(2). [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 3:59 pm
Although this may not cause a considerable impact on professional sports leagues and teams if the player is a substitute who does not play, consider if the situation arose in the case of a marquee player. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 3:41 pm
(1978), 6 B.C.L.R. 25 at 27 (S.C.). at paras. 7-8, which I consider to be relevant to the present application, namely: Occasionally parties can get caught up in the fascination of the interlocutory process and lose sight of the fact that some day the matter must go to trial even though a "perfect" framework does not exist for its presentation. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 2:12 pm
How does the Congress pay for this giveaway? [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 7:00 am
The Takeover Code does not allow for some conditions present in some U.S. deals (like due diligence or financing conditions) and requires disclosure of all investor holdings (including derivatives) over 1 percent of the outstanding during the takeover period, providing detailed insight into a target's shareholder base. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 11:31 pm
_r=1 [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 5:03 pm
”[1] The issues at the root of DRM are by no means new, but have recently been exacerbated by the influx of the Internet and new technologies.[2] The current lack of an adequate means of regulation and the subsequent distribution of music and media by consumers has led to a great deal of litigation. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 8:51 am
” [33] III. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 8:58 pm
” [33] However, due to the fact that the Tribune Company filed separately from the Chicago Cubs organization, the team should be clear from such action. [34] V. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 7:00 pm
A sports spectator assumes similar risks as does a sports participant. [35] Courts usually conclude that a “spectator has a duty to protect himself or herself not only against the dangers of which he or she has actual knowledge but also against such dangers incident to the game as would be apparent to a reasonable person in the exercise of due care. [read post]
