Search for: "Givens v. Givens"
Results 5401 - 5420
of 67,529
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Oct 2010, 12:08 am
(See Palmer v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 3:55 am
In other words, the probationary teacher was entitled to pay corresponding to the number of days for which she was not given the statutory number of days of notice prior to effective date of her termination. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 2:36 pm
By Jason Rantanen American Calcar, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 8:30 am
The post West London Mental Health NHS Trust v Chhabra [2013] UKSC 80 appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 11:17 am
Just like they control what team you play for in the minor leagues, how long you're bound to a given club once you're drafted, etc. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 2:09 pm
Needless to say, given that Judge Reinhardt wrote the majority opinion, you know how the case turned out: the denial of the defendant's habeas petition was reversed and remanded.The California Attorney General files a motion for panel rehearing (and rehearing en banc), an event that's likely going nowhere. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 12:13 pm
But the Court of Appeal concludes that there's no prejudice therefrom given the state of the overall evidence.Sometimes an attorney should be congratulated for winning at trial. [read post]
29 Jan 2022, 9:33 am
(And, parenthetically, given the facts of the case -- which happened down here in San Diego -- Gerson is super lucky merely to be alive, rather than shot and killed by the police.)The facts are also a fairly chilling lesson about what can happen when you find yourself way too deep in the whole hallucinogenic scene, my friends.To repeat the mantra of a show from my youth (albeit in a somewhat different context): "Lets get careful out there. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 1:57 pm
They throw him in federal prison for seven-plus years.This is a particularly surprising sentence given that you can do analogous things that are far, far worse than this and receive utterly no punishment whatsoever. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 3:16 pm
Amongst other questions raised, but not decided, by the opinion are whether aliens who are in the United States without authorization are included in the phrase "the people" to whom various rights are given under the Constitution. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 12:42 am
The parties then fought about whether evidence of the subsequent sexual assault was admissible, and after the parties had given their opening statement at trial, a writ was filed, the trial got stayed, and ultimately it goes all the way up to the California Supreme Court, which holds: "Maybe the evidence is admissible. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 6:10 am
It is lawful under the MWA to intercept a communication where the intercepting person is a party to the communication and all of the parties have given their prior written consent. [read post]
10 Mar 2025, 4:10 pm
Will he be some other age given his pretrial custody credits? [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 1:20 pm
And on that central point, the California Supreme Court says absolutely nothing.The price of unanimity and speed here may be that, given the concession, we've resolve the tangential dispute, but not helped at all to decide what's really at issue and what motivated the decision below.But, hey. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 12:20 pm
But it's clearly new.I think Judge Smith has a pretty good point that (1) district courts are given a pretty large amount of discretion with preliminary injunction decisions, and it's fairly aggressive for the Ninth Circuit to step in and reverse the district court here, and (2) mandatory injunctions -- like ordering Google to take down the movie -- are subject to even more scrutiny. [read post]
16 May 2017, 11:53 am
Defendant had been given various diagnoses, including schizoaffective disorder bipolar type, schizophrenia, a psychotic disorder not otherwise specified, antisocial personality disorder, and polysubstance abuse. [read post]
4 May 2015, 1:05 pm
"Given these facts, to say that Mr. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 1:43 pm
Particularly given that the defendants at issue will be sitting around in prison, deprived of their (alleged) rights under Prop. 47, during this entire period.Take the case up now and resolve it once and for all. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 11:55 am
Moreover, particularly given the absence of much evidence linking the defendant to the crime, as well as the fact that his first jury trial deadlocked, that error's not harmless. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 12:46 pm
Given these facts, rather than speculate, it makes sense to ask the Washington Supreme Court directly.For whatever it's worth, on the merits, I think that the EEOC (and Montana Supreme Court) take the right approach. [read post]
