Search for: "Grant v Grant" Results 5401 - 5420 of 104,899
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Oct 2007, 12:30 pm
However, earlier this week (see this ILB entry from Oct. 9th) the Supreme Court granted emergency transfer directly from the trial court under Rule 56(A) in the case of State v. [read post]
28 Jan 2003, 9:22 am
[JURIST] Although no cert grants were announced in Monday's regular Order List [PDF text], the US Supreme Court did grant cert Monday in Castro v. [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 6:09 am
In Matter of Aliperti v Trotta, the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Brookhaven denied an area variance for the size of a home after it had previously granted the same variance for the adjoining parcel several years earlier. [read post]
31 May 2007, 9:31 pm
The divergence between IT and BIO folks on patent issues has been noted for some time.For example, on the controversial "second window" for post-grant review:http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2007/04/second-window-post-grant-review-comes.htmlPharma on KSR v. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 6:20 am
SCOTUSBlog reports on the cert petition in Boehner v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 11:44 am
Less than 48 hours after the Supreme Court granted certiorari in McDonald v. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 9:54 pm by Patent Docs
Storage Units Do Not Satisfy Second Prong of Cray Test for Establishing "Regular and Established Place of Business" By Donald Zuhn -- Earlier this year, in CDX Diagnostic, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
By Donald Zuhn -- Last month, in Serta Simmons Bedding, LLC v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
District Court for the Central District of California granted a motion for summary judgment filed by Defendant Designs for Health, Inc. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 8:19 pm by Patent Docs
By Josh Rich -- Earlier today, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Return Mail, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
By Andrew Williams -- On March 4, the Supreme Court announced that the Cuozzo Speed Technologies, LLC v. [read post]