Search for: "Grant v. State"
Results 5401 - 5420
of 61,137
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2015, 8:33 am
On March 25, 2015, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Young v. [read post]
12 May 2016, 12:25 pm
On April 25, 2016, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments inKirtsaeng v. [read post]
10 Aug 2024, 1:43 pm
USA v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 11:08 am
V. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 3:06 pm
United States and Rodriguez-Martinez v. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 7:10 am
This month, a Superior Court judge, in the case of UMNV 205-207 Newbury, LLC v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
At the same time, petitioners moved for a preliminary injunction preventing the application of ProcellaCOR during the litigation, which was opposed by respondents and granted by Supreme Court. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
At the same time, petitioners moved for a preliminary injunction preventing the application of ProcellaCOR during the litigation, which was opposed by respondents and granted by Supreme Court. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 7:56 am
448 F.3d 605 (2006) BILL GRAHAM ARCHIVES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 5:28 am
By Stevie Phillips In State v. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 5:28 am
By Stevie Phillips In State v. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 8:25 am
The Michigan Supreme Court heard oral arguments in McLain v City of Lansing Fire Department on October 6, 2016 to decide whether to grant leave to appeal. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 10:41 am
(Business Roundtable and US Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 7:30 am
Tire Corp. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 4:59 pm
See State v. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 4:42 am
California and United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2025, 6:00 am
Claimant appealed.The Appellate Division, citing Orser v Wholesale Fuel Distribs. [read post]
10 Jan 2025, 6:00 am
Claimant appealed.The Appellate Division, citing Orser v Wholesale Fuel Distribs. [read post]
24 Dec 2016, 6:47 pm
California State Lottery Comm., (1994) 21 Cal.App.4th 1739, 1744; Sandoval v. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 11:13 am
It ultimately dismissed their complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. [read post]