Search for: "HARMS v. HARMS" Results 5401 - 5420 of 36,768
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Feb 2022, 4:54 pm by INFORRM
In theory yes, so long as the statement causes serious harm to your reputation or is likely to. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 1:42 pm by ACLU
v=wfqUk0tdjkgUsing people’s names and pronouns is a matter of respect. [read post]
In Benson v Central Health Authority, an employer fulfilled its duty to accommodate despite the negotiated resignation of its employee with a disability. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 9:45 am by Neil H. Buchanan
  Even good reporting is filtered through the lens of students being harmed by school shutdowns. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
The Supreme Court yesterday handed down judgment in ZXC v Bloomberg LP [2022] UKSC 5. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 8:00 am by INFORRM
In a lengthy ruling, the Supreme Court confirmed that Article 8 ECHR encompasses a ‘reputational’ dimension which, while primarily protected by the tort of defamation, is also protected by the tort of misuse of private information if the claimed harm attains a certain level of seriousness. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 7:01 am by Eric Goldman
” In other words, they sought to establish (using centuries-old chattel-based theft doctrines rather than trademark law) that a trademark owner has the unrestricted right to shut down anyone using their trademarks, even if no consumers are harmed. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 4:00 am by Michael Erdle
Disclosure would harm the business and financial interests of the parties involved. [read post]