Search for: "In The Matter Of: D.C"
Results 5401 - 5420
of 9,982
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2014, 4:52 pm
These comments are a matter of public record. [read post]
12 May 2014, 10:47 am
In one of the first – if not the first – instance, two Washington, D.C. [read post]
12 May 2014, 8:43 am
Court of Appeals, D.C. [read post]
12 May 2014, 8:38 am
Court of Appeals, D.C. [read post]
12 May 2014, 6:08 am
Born and educated in New York City, John rose to partner in well-known Texas intellectual property firm, and in later years became a Texas-based partner of a storied Washington, D.C. law firm, in which he chaired the IP group. [read post]
12 May 2014, 6:04 am
Crabbe returns from Washington, D.C. [read post]
10 May 2014, 4:00 am
Things hadn’t gone well for the Department of Justice with D.C. [read post]
9 May 2014, 10:30 am
But we had wonderful teachers because of segregation, which meant that black teachers, no matter how well educated they were, couldn't get jobs anywhere but the segregated system. [read post]
9 May 2014, 7:45 am
The operative provision of the 2009 Act that sets forth subject matter jurisdiction for a military commission provides, “An offense specified . . . is triable by military commission . . . only if the offense is committed in the context of and associated with hostilities. [read post]
9 May 2014, 6:02 am
Beller is a partner focusing on complex securities, corporate governance and corporate matters at Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP. [read post]
8 May 2014, 5:46 am
Another good day for D.C. bar discipline. [read post]
7 May 2014, 9:05 am
Washington, D.C. - The United States Supreme Court unanimously affirmed a Sixth Circuit ruling that intellectual property lawyers for defendant Static Control Components, Inc. of Sanford, North Carolina had properly pled a counterclaim for false advertising under the Lanham Act against Lexmark International, Inc. of Lexington, Kentucky. [read post]
6 May 2014, 1:38 pm
” Further, an “unexplained violation of that standard renders the defendant negligent as a matter of law. [read post]
6 May 2014, 12:00 pm
Not even the D.C. [read post]
6 May 2014, 10:40 am
Licenses Washington D.C. [read post]
6 May 2014, 9:28 am
Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
6 May 2014, 6:31 am
First, one of the three judges deciding this was from the D.C. district court, sitting by designation. [read post]
5 May 2014, 7:59 am
Following on the heels of Commissioners’ Gallagher and Piwowar’s joint statement calling for a stay of the conflict mineral rules pending final outcome of the National Association of Manufacturers legal challenge, Keith Higgins, Director of Corporation Finance, issued his own statement yesterday clarifying CorpFin’s position in light of the D.C. [read post]
5 May 2014, 6:39 am
., phones, tablets), social media accounts, and/or personal email accounts affect the proper balance to be struck between employers’ rights and employees’ Section 7 rights to communicate about work-related matters? [read post]
3 May 2014, 5:29 am
House of Representatives deeply unsympathetic to business concerns, he became a restaurant owner in Washington, D.C., and discovered a lot of things worth knowing about how the world works. [read post]
