Search for: "In re Roberts"
Results 5401 - 5420
of 13,417
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2011, 10:54 pm
If you’re a regular or even occasional reader of Mandelman Matters, you’re reading this now… and waiting for the twist or the punch line, right? [read post]
22 Feb 2020, 4:12 am
Procedural and Factual Background Through the Settlement Enforcement Order, the court granted, in part, Tagnetics’ motion to enforce a settlement reached between it, as the putative Chapter 7 debtor in this case, and the Petitioning Creditors who filed an involuntary bankruptcy petition against Tagnetics.1 The integral terms of the Settlement Enforcement Order are as follows: 1 The original petitioning creditors who filed the involuntary petition against Tagnetics included the… [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 3:40 am
On October 16, 2014, at the third annual LLC Institute held in Arlington, Virginia, I’ll be on a panel along with Professor Eric Chiappinelli (Texas Tech University School of Law), Professor Benjamin Means (University of South Carolina School of Law), Professor Douglas Moll (University of Houston Law Center), and Professor Robert Thompson (Georgetown Law) for a program called Family Business Disputes. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 9:42 am
Roberts Jr. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 4:17 pm
“Well, we’re ready,” Roberts replies. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 11:34 am
“We’re a big fat target here,” Verrilli complained. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 7:25 am
A few months after the Alito incident, in March 2010, Chief Justice John Roberts entered the fray in remarks at the University of Alabama, where he told his audience that he was troubled that the State of the Union speech has “degenerated to a political pep rally,” and he was “not sure why we’re there. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 11:48 am
Verrilli responded is that people are not left shifting enormous uncompensated burial costs to others - they're met by family members or the government. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 12:59 pm
Apparently skeptical, the Chief Justice characterized that argument as "one strike and you're out. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 5:10 am
Roberts said it wasn’t necessary to re-examine Smith, which had held that neutral, generally applicable laws that incidentally burden free exercise rights are unlikely to violate the First Amendment. [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 9:57 am
" Chief Justice Roberts glumly remarked, "I suppose if we're going to apply the Brecht standard ourselves, we would have to do the same thing. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 12:29 pm
" That distinction seemed less troubling to Roberts. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 9:05 am
For example, Chief Justice John Roberts set the tone of the court’s oral arguments by saying, “Since we’re dealing in a case with individual borrowers or would-be borrowers, I think it’s appropriate to consider some of the fairness arguments. [read post]
15 Oct 2007, 5:04 pm
After the war, Brockenbrough was the one who put to Robert E. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 12:47 pm
They think they’re right, and they’d like to have their view on the matter obeyed by others. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 3:33 am
The family moved to Shropshire and two Grampian Police officers travelled to Shrewsbury in September last year to re-interview Hollie at a special facility. [read post]
10 May 2010, 9:14 am
Senator Cornyn voiced similar views during the nomination of Chief Justice Roberts. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 2:03 pm
” “And you’re trying to carry it,” Roberts said doubtfully, “without any direct evidence, with no alternative map, with no odd-shaped districts, which we often get in gerrymandering cases, and with a wealth of political data that you’re suggesting your friends on the other side would ignore in favor of racial data. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 11:06 am
For Roberts, though, that seemed almost bizarre: [I]f someone is going to adopt such a radical proposition [in Roberts’s words, that “you can enforce arbitration against somebody who didn’t sign the agreement”] it probably should be us, rather than send it back to the Eleventh Circuit and say, well, if you want to go against all our precedents on arbitration, fine, but we’re not going to do it. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 9:40 am
Judge Robert Chambers of the U.S. [read post]
