Search for: "J. Smith Smith" Results 5401 - 5420 of 5,438
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2020, 12:27 pm by Elliot Setzer
.: The Brookings Institution will hold a conversation on Defending NATO’s eastern flank with Jüri Luik, Estonia’s minister of defense. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 1:33 pm by Wolfgang Demino
.; and/or• (j) all claims arising from or relating directly or indirectly to the disclosure by us . . . of any non-public personal information about you.In addition, relevant to this appeal, the arbitration provision states:You acknowledge and agree that by entering into this Arbitration Provision:(a) YOU ARE GIVING UP YOUR RIGHT TO HAVE A TRIAL BY JURY TO RESOLVE ANY DISPUTE ALLEGED AGAINST US, THE LENDER AND/OR OUR/ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES; . . . and(c) YOU ARE GIVING UP YOUR RIGHT… [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 11:09 am by William Ford, Tia Sewell
Ten experts will be featured, including William J. [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal Barr Books Trump’s Hotel for $30,000 Holiday Party MSN – Jonathan O’Connell and David Fahrenthold (Washington Post) | Published: 8/27/2019 Attorney General William Barr will hold a family holiday party for 200 people at Trump International Hotel in December that is likely to cost $30,000. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 7:07 am by Mandelman
Bank, represented by its loan servicer, Select Portfolio Servicing (“SPS”), who was in turn represented by Buffalo’s most infamous foreclosure mill, Steven J. [read post]
18 Jul 2009, 7:31 am
At a March hearing of the Senate Judiciary Committee on the law enforcement response to the financial crisis, Senator Patrick J. [read post]
24 Dec 2020, 8:30 pm by Jim Sedor
National/Federal A Frustrated Trump Redoubles Efforts to Challenge Election Result MSN – Felicia Sonmez, Josh Dawsey, Dan Lamothe, and Matt Zapotosky (Washington Post) | Published: 12/20/2020 President Trump has intensified efforts to overturn the election, raising a series of radical measures in recent days, including military intervention, seizing voting machines, and a 13th-hour appeal to the U.S. [read post]
2 May 2007, 2:06 am
JOHNSON, KLEIN, KRUEGER, KRUGER, LANZA, LARKIN,   LAVALLE,   LEIBELL,                   LIBOUS,   LITTLE,   MALTESE,   MARCELLINO,   MAZIARZ, MONTGOMERY, MORAHAN,                   NOZZOLIO,   ONORATO,… [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 7:43 pm
Strine notes that Unocal’s board met for eight or nine hours to consider Pickens’ offer — a response to Smith v. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 10:42 am by Joel R. Brandes
Emergency Jurisdiction Continues Under UCCJEA for More than Three Years Where Family Court Not Satisfied With Steps to Protect Children Taken by Home State of New Mexico Court In Matter of Bridget Y, --- N.Y.S.2d ----, 2011 WL 6848352 (N.Y.A.D. 4 Dept.), a 3-2 decison, the primary issue raised was whether Family Court properly exercised temporary emergency jurisdiction over the children pursuant to Domestic Relations Law 76-c (3). [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
As we reported yesterday, the California Supreme Court denied the petitions for review in Wyeth v. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal A GOP Donor Gave $2.5 Million for a Voter Fraud Investigation. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 5:10 pm by Trent Dykes
Most proxy access bylaws address, in some form, the following issues:  (a) ownership threshold, (b) length of ownership, (c) maximum number of stockholder nominated candidates, (d) calculation of qualifying ownership, including treatment of “loaned” shares, (e) stockholder group limit, (f) maximum number of access nominees, (g) notice deadlines, (h) future disqualification of stockholder nominees, (i) voting commitments, and (j) third-party compensation arrangements. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 8:51 am by jonathanturley
Here is my annual list of Halloween torts and crimes. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 10:01 am by jonathanturley
Here is my annual list of Halloween torts and crimes. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 6:50 am by Barry Sookman
Jack, 2018 BCSC 610 where Justice Smith held that Google was not able to show that the global delisting order made against it violated its First Amendment rights in the U.S. or the core values of the U.S. or that the California order undermined the effectiveness of the Equustek order. [read post]