Search for: "Mark May"
Results 5401 - 5420
of 63,422
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jan 2021, 3:49 am
Weighing the Factors: The CAFC rejected QuikTrip's claim that the Board gave undue weight to the first DuPont factor, noting that "one DuPont factor 'may be dispositive in a likelihood of confusion analysis, especially when that single factor is the dissimilarity of the marks.'" Champagne Louis Roederer, S.A. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 7:13 am
Secondly, Mr Malynicz submits that even if IP Translator implies that lack of clarity in the specification of the goods or services may be relied upon as a ground of invalidity under the Directive, the specification relied on by Total for the "Your View" mark is sufficiently certain to comply with the standard implied in the Directive. [read post]
31 May 2024, 12:02 pm
For marks which do contain descriptive elements, it may be helpful to have built up acquired distinctiveness through use before attempting registration. [read post]
3 Sep 2022, 6:57 am
In relation to the mark applied for, the elements ‘tiger’ and ‘cat’ are readily identifiable within that mark, given that those two words have a clear meaning for the English-speaking public. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 11:53 pm
" The Board found the mark not likely to cause confusion with the identical mark, registered and used for restaurant services. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 1:13 pm
Though most of your traffic may come from search engines (around 75%). [read post]
13 May 2016, 6:14 pm
" Mark Berman of The Washington Post reports that "Pfizer tightens restrictions to keep drugs from being used in executions. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 9:02 am
People are still free to use such marks, but they don't get the same kinds of legal protections against infringement of such marks that owners of other marks get. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 9:54 am
If an important portion of both marks is the same, then the marks may be confusingly similar notwithstanding some differences. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 2:28 am
The Board found that Applicant may rely on its use of the mark CAPITAL CITY BANK GROUP to establish priority, and that its first use date was 1975. [read post]
13 May 2016, 3:52 am
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has ruled (In re Rhoads, May 4, 2016, Clevenger, R.). [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 11:14 am
April was originally marked as National Distracted Driving Awareness Month by Rep. [read post]
19 May 2022, 9:04 pm
However, that may be changing. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 4:15 am
This language raises the question of the conditions under which a sign may be said to be “evocative” of a PDO or PGI. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 9:39 am
The current surge of anti-labor activities, especially the efforts to strip workers of their right to collective bargaining, may portend yet another turning point in American labor history. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:43 am
If you fail to file the claim within this time frame, you may lose your right to compensation altogether. [read post]
16 May 2023, 11:55 am
Businesses in this industry may need to rely on alternative strategies for brand protection, such as securing state-level trademark registrations. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 11:05 pm
But January, 2004 marked a turning point. [read post]
16 May 2023, 11:55 am
Businesses in this industry may need to rely on alternative strategies for brand protection, such as securing state-level trademark registrations. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 3:35 am
Absent evidence of three years of non-use, however, a party can still succeed on a claim of abandonment, but it will need to carry its burden of persuasion by a preponderance of direct and/or circumstantial evidence that the mark owner has ceased using the mark without an intent to resume use. [read post]
