Search for: "Michael T Downes" Results 5401 - 5420 of 10,512
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2013, 9:30 am by azatty
LPM, in case you don’t know, is a publication of the American Bar Association. [read post]
13 Jul 2013, 6:40 am by Bill Marler
The health department said it warned Iguana Joe’s about critical violations and how to fix them, but the restaurant didn’t listen so it had no choice but to close the place down at 9 a.m. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 10:31 am by Allison Tussey
The Builders and straw buyers executed the HUD-1 settlement statements reflecting that the straw buyers were making the down payment on the properties, when in fact, the down payments were made by the Builders. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 12:00 am
I don’t want secret courts protecting my rights to be let alone. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am by Abbott & Kindermann
LEXIS 2373, handed down its much-anticipated opinion regarding stormwater runoff from logging roads. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 4:00 am by Robert McKay
Behind the editor, and tending to breathe down his neck, stands the accountant with advice, criticism and, occasionally, grim approval. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 9:15 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Michael Shear writes in the Times. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 2:49 am by Florian Mueller
The Galaxy S II AT&T shipped after the notice date Apple used at the trial, so there was no need to vacate the related damages. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 8:08 am by Allison Trzop
Windsor, in which the Court struck down the federal Defense of Marriage Act. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 8:41 am by Ron Coleman
Having sent one of those messages myself … back in, oh, 2002 … I must admit I am curious why it hasn’t been received yet, evidently… Anyway, it always comes down to this:  No one really knows what an exceptional case is, because it’s obviously an entirely subjective test pretty much left to the sound discretion of the District Court. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 11:24 am by Larry Tribe
But Justice Scalia didn’t so much as consider the possibility, one embraced not just by today’s majority but by no less a jurist than Michael Boudin as Chief Judge of the First Circuit in his earlier decision invalidating DOMA’s Section 3 on very similar grounds, that considerations of federalism might point to a particularly rigorous examination of the purported justifications for a measure like Section 3. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 6:11 pm by Chuck Cosson
[2]I’m referring to the version of the CDA amended in 2003 to remove the indecency provisions struck down as unconstitutional restrictions of speech. [read post]