Search for: "People v Johns" Results 5401 - 5420 of 9,052
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Oct 2013, 10:45 am
 The Ninth Circuit recently issued an opinion in Rock River Communications, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 6:04 pm by John Elwood
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relisted cases. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 6:44 pm by Patrick S. O'Donnell
” [emphasis added]—John Irwin, Prisons in Turmoil (Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Co., 1980)“In Furman v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 11:14 am by Larry Catá Backer
United States. 379 U.S. 241 (1964) (commerce power could be used to apply an anti-discrimination statute to an establishment that served people in interstate travel and that could affect national policy); Katzenbach v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 4:43 am by Timothy P. Flynn
 The case, Ter Beek v City of Wyoming, involves the legal challenge brought by a card-carrying pot smoker against his hometown for an ordinance that was passed in response to the MMA.The challenged Wyoming ordinance subjects people to a violation for possessing marijuana on the basis of the federal prohibition of marijuana as a Schedule I drug, as set forth in the federal Controlled Substance Act. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 2:57 pm
 Regent University v Regent's University London [2013] EWPCC 39 Patents County Court, 6 September 2013, is a decision of Mr Recorder Alastair Wilson QC that has so far received little attention, possibly because it's only an interim ruling from a junior court. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm by Jason Mazzone
In an article called "The Millions Left Out of Health Reform by John Roberts," Matthew Yglesias reports that the fact that working poor in certain states will not benefit from the Affordable Care Act's Medicaid expansion is "due to the actions of Chief Justice John Roberts" who, in NFIB v. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm by John Dean
  Our Constitution calls for an ongoing and perpetual government unless modified under the amendment process set forth in Article V of the Constitution or by revolution. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 10:43 am by Ritika Singh
Linda Greenhouse of the New York Times writes about the oral arguments in Bahlul v. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 5:07 pm by INFORRM
Journalism and regulation John Witherow and Martin Ivens have been confirmed, after an eight-month wait, as editors respectively of The Times and Sunday Times. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 1:20 pm by Brian Shiffrin
It is well settled that a defendant's statutory right to testify before the grand jury " must be scrupulously protected' " (People v Smith, 87 NY2d 715, 721, quoting People v Corrigan, 80 NY2d 326, 332). [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 10:13 am by Rick Garnett
  Or, they could hold simply that the 1983 Marsh v. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 5:15 pm by Jon Gelman
Kleinberg made his remarks after closing arguments in The People of California v. [read post]