Search for: "STATE v. SCOTT" Results 5401 - 5420 of 6,298
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2010, 9:05 am by Jeff Gamso
*********On Tuesday, as you know, in United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 5:23 am by Carolyn Elefant
Gura took the case from its humble origins in federal district court to a landmark win in District v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 2:43 pm by Pace Law School Library
  State regulation of air pollution fromoffshore ships is upheld in PacificMerchant Shipping Ass’n v. [read post]
29 May 2024, 3:52 pm by Reference Staff
For scholarly publications, Rule 10.7.1(d) adds a descriptive parenthetical note for citing cases where an enslaved person was involved, and provides examples like “Wall v. [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 2:33 am by INFORRM
Gulati and others v MGN Ltd (2015): the unredacted judgement At the time of the trial’s conclusion, and for three years afterwards, only a redacted version of the judgment was available. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 7:47 am
Title V/CSHCN has supported care notebooks for families and hired parent advocates around the state. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 12:01 pm
Box 1698 Jackson, MS 39215 Phone: (601) 987-4872 (V/TTY); (800) 852-8328 (V/TTY/Toll Free in MS) Web: http://www.msprojectstart.org T.K. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog)   Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 12:44 pm by Thomas O'Toole
The “foregone conclusion” doctrine was recently applied to the digital realm in United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 3:00 am by M@jux-@dmin
If the defendant knew that what they were doing was extremely dangerous or the situation was such that they should have known that their act would most likely cause harm, Arkansas courts consider that “willful negligence,” according to Scott v. [read post]
24 Oct 2024, 2:39 am by Mark I. Schickman, Schickman Law
County of Sacramento; Scott Jones, Sheriff, United States Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit, No. 23-15970, Filed September 9, 2024. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 1:01 am
Ibrahim, William & Mary Law School, on Wednesday, November 2, 2016 Tags: Capital formation, Crowdfunding, Investor protection, IPOs, JOBS Act, SEC, SEC rulemaking, Securities regulation,Small firms, Tech companies ISS Proposes New 2017 Voting Policies Posted by Lyuba Goltser, Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, on Wednesday, November 2, 2016 Tags: Boards of Directors, Charter & bylaws, Dual-class stock, Executive Compensation, Institutional Investors, IPOs,ISS, Proxy advisors, Proxy voting,… [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 7:37 am
"Right now, we're not getting the net effect across all teens that we're hoping for," says the author of that study, Scott V. [read post]