Search for: "SUMMERS v. STATE"
Results 5401 - 5420
of 6,218
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2014, 6:00 am
(Gillette v Donahoe, April 8, 2014, Jackson, C). [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 9:55 am
Nomination of Directors Last year's AFSCME v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 12:54 pm
Best, Roy] [The article below first appeared in Antitrust, Vol. 26, No. 3, Summer 2012. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 10:31 am
Aside from the obvious lack of authenticity by displacing supermodels and celebrity influencers, there are potential legal issues that arise in the United States with respect to the use of digital models. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 10:31 am
Aside from the obvious lack of authenticity by displacing supermodels and celebrity influencers, there are potential legal issues that arise in the United States with respect to the use of digital models. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 3:59 pm
Aside from the obvious lack of authenticity by displacing supermodels and celebrity influencers, there are potential legal issues that arise in the United States with respect to the use of digital models. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 3:59 pm
Aside from the obvious lack of authenticity by displacing supermodels and celebrity influencers, there are potential legal issues that arise in the United States with respect to the use of digital models. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 10:31 am
Aside from the obvious lack of authenticity by displacing supermodels and celebrity influencers, there are potential legal issues that arise in the United States with respect to the use of digital models. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 3:59 pm
Aside from the obvious lack of authenticity by displacing supermodels and celebrity influencers, there are potential legal issues that arise in the United States with respect to the use of digital models. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 6:00 am
Supreme Court last cited one of its pieces in McDonald v. [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
Landmark IP implications for universities: University of Western Australia v Gray: (IPRoo), (Managing Intellectual Property), (The Age), The latest edition of US Trade Representative’s ‘Special 301 Report’: (Ars Technica), (Ars Technica), (IAM), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Patry Copyright Blog), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Patent Docs), (IP Law360), Court rejects RIAA ‘making available’ theory: Atlantic v Howell:… [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 12:12 pm
Arguing for the store chain in Wal-Mart Stores v. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 2:08 pm
The case, West Virginia v. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 6:52 am
The lawsuit, captioned Gregorio de la Rosa, Sr., et al., v. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 11:29 am
Supreme Court Decision, Lingle v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 3:53 pm
He cites “a justice who served as an Arizona state legislator” and quotes from Sandra Day O’Connor’s opinion in Davis v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Class 46) India Chennai IP Appellate Board: Well-known trademarks - consumer recollection is key: Societe des Produits Nestle SA v Jai ram (International Law Office) Bombay High Court rules on the infringement of copyright in drawings: Indiana Gratings Private Limited & Anr v Anand Udyog Fabricators Private Limited & Ors (Spicy IP) Is ‘science’ essential for creating patent lawyers: some ‘general’ thoughts (Spicy… [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Class 46) India Chennai IP Appellate Board: Well-known trademarks - consumer recollection is key: Societe des Produits Nestle SA v Jai ram (International Law Office) Bombay High Court rules on the infringement of copyright in drawings: Indiana Gratings Private Limited & Anr v Anand Udyog Fabricators Private Limited & Ors (Spicy IP) Is ‘science’ essential for creating patent lawyers: some ‘general’ thoughts (Spicy… [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 9:48 pm
Mountain States Mutual Casualty Co. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 10:14 am
At today's Motorola Mobility v. [read post]
