Search for: "State v. Back"
Results 5401 - 5420
of 40,968
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2012, 1:30 am
Osesek v. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 9:25 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 2:05 pm
Accordingly, the Supreme Court remanded the case back to the Lenawee Circuit Court to consider that prior decision as well as an affidavit from the Plaintiff’s predecessor in title stating that any use of the easement at issue was by their permission and consent. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 5:22 am
The Wisconsin Supreme Court had long been a leader, perhaps reluctantly, in developing excellent tribal-state court relationships dating back to its important Teague decision nearly ten years ago. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 5:22 am
The Wisconsin Supreme Court had long been a leader, perhaps reluctantly, in developing excellent tribal-state court relationships dating back to its important Teague decision nearly ten years ago. [read post]
12 Jul 2009, 8:29 pm
Five years later, in Wesley College v. [read post]
23 Aug 2014, 12:11 pm
Unfortunately, New Jersey courts have since rolled back those protections, starting with a 2011 ruling in State v. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 2:15 am
Equal pay for equal workBertoldi v State of New York, 275 AD2d 227; Motion to appeal denied, 96 NY2d 706; Motion to appeal on constitutional grounds denied, 95 NY2d 958Section 115 of the Civil Service Law provides that State employees are entitled to equal pay for equal work, and regular increases in pay in proper proportion to increase of ability, increase of output and increase of equality of work demonstrated in service.While Section 115 applies only to employees of the… [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 12:27 pm
Florida; Atkins v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 3:33 am
Last year, in State v. [read post]
5 May 2007, 1:32 pm
Sod Farms v. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 6:34 pm
Ken V will call to answer further questions 6. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 8:28 pm
Witcher v. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 7:30 am
I blogged about the opinion back when the Court granted certiorari in Elonis to answer this question presented:Whether, consistent with the First Amendment and Virginia v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 12:22 pm
In Boumediene v. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 12:47 pm
In today’s case (Kam v. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 3:00 am
The case of the day, A.O.A. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 9:37 am
Sanders v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 5:15 pm
All state laws vary. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 1:18 am
1538: Aidan O’Neill QC submits that the role of this court is to rebalance the constitution. 1530: Aidan O’Neill QC refers to the decision in Padfield v Minister of Agriculture at page 1061 of the decision. [read post]
