Search for: "State v. C. R."
Results 5401 - 5420
of 13,583
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2015, 3:48 am
The First Department held this allegation insufficient and dismissed the complaint’s remaining claims, explaining that this Court has made clear that Business Corporation Law § 626(c) “does not differentiate between minority and majority shareholders for demand purposes” (see Ocelot Capital Mgt., LLC v Hershkovitz, 90 AD3d 464, 466 [1st Dept 2011]). [read post]
18 May 2015, 1:00 am
R (Cornwall Council) v Secretary of State for Health; R (Cornwall Council) v Somerset County Council, heard 18-19 March 2015. [read post]
17 May 2015, 10:02 pm
See Akamai Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
17 May 2015, 4:30 am
http://t.co/huBTdk9kvC -> Nortel bankruptcy: $7.3B in remaining assets to be split among subsidiaries http://t.co/zC5weueQOm -> Cybersecurity Compliance Poses Challenge for Providers http://t.co/rfapvu4wdq -> CJEU says that distribution right may be infringed just by advertising sale of protected works http://t.co/2zKOg3clAy -> Online shaming: the return of mob morality http://t.co/QxtQtTVOeg -> blogged: Computer and Internet Law Updates for 2015-05-12 http://t.co/rnmbcKN0EX ->… [read post]
16 May 2015, 1:37 pm
C. [read post]
15 May 2015, 10:34 am
New York v. [read post]
15 May 2015, 9:10 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Resource Investments v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 7:04 pm
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2015) Sexual Assault has been much in the news in the United States. [read post]
14 May 2015, 3:31 pm
KQED, Inc., 438 U.S. 1, 11 (1978) (stating that “[t]here is an undoubted right to gather news ‘from any source by means within the law’” (quoting Branzburg v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 6:45 am
Archstone Property Management, Inc., May 12, 2015, Bea, C.). [read post]
14 May 2015, 12:52 am
, Katharina Boele-Woelki, University of Utrecht (The Netherlands)19:00 Conference DinnerThursday, June 4, 20159:00-10:30 Parallel Sessions VV.B Indigenous Law and State Law· Explicit-Implicit Legal Pluralism, Elina… [read post]
13 May 2015, 7:00 pm
In Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 5:25 am
Nucor Corp., May 11, 2015, Gregory, R.). [read post]
13 May 2015, 5:12 am
” United States v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 2:09 am
On ‘fend for oneself’, while this might have been useful in the context of R v Waveney DC ex p Bowers [1983] QB 238, 244H, “it is not the statutory test, and at least to some people a person may be vulnerable even though he can fend for himself”. [read post]
12 May 2015, 4:48 pm
Yet, the CFAA was a hotly contested issue in Nelson Levine De Luca & Hamilton, LLC v. [read post]
12 May 2015, 4:42 pm
Ohio State Univ. [read post]
12 May 2015, 2:47 pm
The Facts of the Case In the recent case of King v. [read post]
12 May 2015, 2:45 pm
Yet, the CFAA was a hotly contested issue in Nelson Levine De Luca & Hamilton, LLC v. [read post]
11 May 2015, 11:01 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
