Search for: "State v. Cash "
Results 5401 - 5420
of 5,707
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2008, 7:26 am
Now with the passage of the Bush administration's economic stimulus package, the GSEs and the Federal Housing Administration can temporarily purchase loans beyond the conventional loan limit.[31] With the exception of Alaska, Hawaii, Guam, and the U.S. virgin Islands, the cap on loans that the two GSEs can back have been temporarily increased from $417,000 to $729,750 until the end of 2008 for more than 70 U.S. counties.[32] This change will allow the… [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 10:41 pm
Distribution and Marketing, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 12:46 am
On Wednesday, March 26, 2008, the United States Supreme Court heard oral argument in the case of Florida Dept. of Revenue v. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 5:06 am
Schachter v. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 12:17 pm
[v] U.S. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 3:14 am
Craig & Bishop, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2008, 1:46 pm
In lieu of the court ordering the non-custodial parent to obtain or maintain health care coverage for the child, the court may order the non-custodial parent to contribute a weekly cash amount towards the medical premium for health care coverage paid by the state of Rhode Island and/or the custodial parent. [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 4:10 pm
At least Churchill knew how to flick a good 'V sign'... as, indeed, did the English archers at Agincourt] And… on that note.. [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 12:38 am
Case Name: Weiss v. [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 12:38 am
Case Name: Weiss v. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 4:35 am
In the specific case, LaRue v. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 11:08 pm
" [17] Van Gorkom The next case is Smith v. [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 3:17 pm
Onyx Acceptance Corp. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 12:04 pm
The state judiciary rejected these arguments, Hill v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 10:44 am
ALLISON V. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 5:18 am
In UNITED STATES v. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 12:24 pm
In the case of The HA2003 Liquidating Trust v. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 12:24 pm
In the case of The HA2003 Liquidating Trust v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 3:38 pm
However, in FTC v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 12:13 pm
US, No. 06-5301 Dismissal of claim for the return of cash that was seized and forfeited in connection with plaintiff's arrest for violating currency reporting laws is affirmed as the district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction because the claim is barred by sovereign immunity. . .U.S. 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, February 27, 2008 U.S. v. [read post]
