Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court"
Results 5401 - 5420
of 9,085
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Sep 2014, 3:19 am
Underwood v. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 9:00 am
”Id. at *8, *14.Judicial DisqualificationIn Liljeberg, the Supreme Court first held that [a] district court judge violated 28 U.S.C. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 6:37 am
The Tenth District Court of Appeals affirmed. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 5:49 am
’” The district court agreed.The TTAB didn’t use the same multifactor test as the district court, which would use the judicial standard (viewing the marks in the marketplace, not side by side in a vacuum). [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 4:52 pm
As stated by the Court of Appeals in Alejandro, this third requirement is also known as the prima facie case requirement. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 4:54 pm
In determining the applicability of the Due Process Clause, the United States Supreme Court first asks whether the asserted individual interests are encompassed within the Fourteenth Amendment's protection of life, liberty or property. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 10:13 pm
The Department of State (DOS) submitted a Statement of Interest to the Court urging it to not hear the case. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 7:33 am
The ruling comes just days after the US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana [official website] became the first federal court to uphold a state's ban on same-sex marriage [JURIST report] since the Supreme Court's verdict in United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 7:13 am
Here, the appeals court first found that the Supreme Court’s decision in McKennon v. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 6:20 am
Ct. 945 (2012), and United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 2:55 pm
In a published decision filed September 15, 2014, the First District Court of Appeal reversed and remanded a trial court’s post-judgment order granting an unsuccessful CEQA petitioner’s motion to tax the entire $64,144 cost bill of respondent City. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 7:33 am
Supreme Court had determined in Federal Express Corp. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 6:04 am
While in 1977 the court held in State ex rel. [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 1:06 pm
Issues of jurisdiction and of conflict of interest in combining legislative, executive and judicial authority in regulating agencies were explored. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 10:41 am
Florida's First District Court of Appeal, in Cahours v. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 8:13 am
” Citing McClain v. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 3:00 am
The Eighth Circuit held it had jurisdiction, granted the Defendants’ petition to appeal the remand orders, vacated the District Court’s orders remanding the cases to the state court and instructed the District Court to proceed consistent with its opinion. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 10:54 am
[Newing v. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 10:21 am
The California Supreme Court Decision When a federal district court court granted summary judgment for Time Warner, Peabody appealed to the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 9:43 pm
(g) If a first application is made to a court which is neither a Principal Court of original jurisdiction in a district or a High Court exercising original jurisdiction in a State, such application not being to a court as defined would be outside Section 42. [read post]
