Search for: "State v. Means" Results 5401 - 5420 of 61,300
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 May 2022, 7:49 am by Eric Goldman
First, I’ve often explained that Section 230 means there is only 1 defendant with respect to any item of harmful content online. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 4:49 am
Jattan alleged he was subjected to religious discrimination and retaliation for bringing a lawsuit.In a prior appeal, Jattan v Queens Coll. of City Univ. of N.Y., 307 AD2d 335, the Appellate Division dismissed Jattan's claims under 42 USC §1983 with respect to Queens College because it was "a senior college and an instrumentality of the State of New York"* and therefore was not a "person" amenable to suit within the meaning of 42 USC … [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 12:50 pm by Kevin Kileen
On July 1, 2010, the Michigan Supreme Court published its Opinion in Foster v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 12:31 pm by Paul D. Swanson
During past month when many patent practitioners may have been distracted by the “laws of nature” meaning of the Mayo v. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 6:26 am by Marty Lederman
A week from Thursday, on February 8, the Supreme Court will hear argument in No. 23-179, Trump v. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 7:37 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
That the primary thrust of N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4(c) is not to interdict speech, but rather conduct, is reinforced in State v. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 8:12 pm by Richard Hunt
New York State Bd. of Elections, 2017 WL 6514837  (S.D.N.Y. [read post]