Search for: "State v. P. B." Results 5401 - 5420 of 6,786
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
It states that “[p]roperty acquired by a spouse at any time by gift, bequest, devise or descent” is separate property. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 10:55 am by Graham Smith
That court has jurisdiction only to determine the damage caused in the Member State within which it is situated. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 10:06 am by Joseph C. McDaniel
It is probably the broadest injunction in the entire body of United States law, because it is designed to stop the "race of diligence" among creditors, and to protect the debtor and the bankruptcy estate, in Arizona and the rest of the country. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 8:08 am by Harry Cole
  At first blush the rules seem relatively straightforward: they specify (at Section 79.4(b)) that “[a]ll nonexempt full-length video programming delivered using Internet protocol must be provided with closed captions if the programming is published or exhibited on television in the United States with captions on or after [certain dates]. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 6:23 am
State Citation: 2008 WY 42 Docket Number: S-07-0199 Appeal from the District Court of Natrona County, Honorable David B. [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
United States The Cyberlaw Clinic reports that it has filed an amicus curiae brief (.pdf) in the United States Supreme Court in Oracle v. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 9:17 am
I then write in the introduction: “[B]etter that ten guilty persons escape, than that one innocent suffer,” said English jurist William Blackstone. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 1:37 pm by Guest Author
The SEC’s Office of Economic Analysis’ 2009 Study on Section 404 states this point more explicitly: “Section 13(b)(2) of the Exchange Act requires companies to maintain effective ICFR, while Section 404 requires management to report on the effectiveness of ICFR. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 6:41 am by Andy Wright
The Department stated: “The United States disagrees with plaintiffs’ unsupported assertion that the Constitution’s Speech or Debate Clause does not apply to the Vice President in his official capacity as the President of the Senate” (p.4 n. 1 & see also p.6). [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 8:59 am by Barry Sookman
For example, the US Congress,[2] the European Union[3] and its member states including the UK[4] and Ireland,[5] Australia[6] and others have been re-examining their copyright laws in light of the challenges posed by digital technologies. [read post]