Search for: "State v. Sales"
Results 5401 - 5420
of 20,371
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2018, 5:15 pm
Common Law Disclosure Requirements A 1963 decision by a California appellate court, Lingsch v. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 5:15 pm
Common Law Disclosure Requirements A 1963 decision by a California appellate court, Lingsch v. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 11:13 am
” People v Federated Radio Corp., 244 N.Y. 33, 38-39 (1926); see also State of New York v Sonifer Realty Corp., 212 A.D.2d 366, 367 (1st Dep’t 1995). [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 11:13 am
” People v Federated Radio Corp., 244 N.Y. 33, 38-39 (1926); see also State of New York v Sonifer Realty Corp., 212 A.D.2d 366, 367 (1st Dep’t 1995). [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 10:59 am
As a respected Senior Judge in New York wrote in the opening lines of his decision in United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 2:22 pm
In Eagle Pipe and Supply, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 2:22 pm
In Eagle Pipe and Supply, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 2:22 pm
In Eagle Pipe and Supply, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 6:28 am
Sales LJ declined to rule upon the point, but he doubted that it did. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 6:28 am
The Court of Appeal Sir Stephen Richards, Moore-Bick and Sales LJJ dismissed Rhuppiah’s onward appeal. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 4:24 pm
” David Spade v. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 4:21 pm
" United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 1:40 pm
Also in the news: YouTube rolls out its anticipated Copyright Match tool, copyright collecting societies in Kenya continue to struggle with accountability, and China launches an IPR awareness campaign.Lady Liberty "faceswap" will cost the United States Postal Service $3.5MBetween 2011 and 2014, the United States Postal Service (USPS) used an image of the Statue of Liberty for its Forever Stamp series (a type of First Class postage stamp). [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 11:33 am
(Other state laws may also apply, such as NY’s consumer protection act as interpreted by the People v. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 9:21 am
" [[N]either the Cuban public media nor its journalists are for sale.] [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 10:29 pm
In Polara Engineering Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 1:11 pm
Because fashion shows were recognized as full-fledged copyright works (‘oeuvres de l’esprit’) under French law by the Civil Supreme Court (Court de Cassation) in 2008 (decision: Ashby v Gaulme, Kenzo et Lacroix (2008) ; Ashby Donald and Others v France [2013] ECHR 28; see here). [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 10:41 am
Justice Kagan said so in Janus v. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 10:41 am
Justice Kagan said so in Janus v. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 7:00 am
The case (South Dakota v. [read post]
