Search for: "State v. So"
Results 5401 - 5420
of 117,809
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2015, 1:55 am
The majority contrasted the case at hand with ECHR cases such as Üner v Netherlands and X v Austria where the ECHR had considered the best interests of the child in determining the proportionality of an interference with parents’ rights under article 8 alone and article 8 combined with article 14. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 4:52 am
J.P. and Eileen Wiles testified for the state (Wiles did so reluctantly. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 12:02 am
The Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human rights yesterday heard the conjoined applications in Von Hannover v Germany and Springer v Germany. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 11:29 am
Yesterday, the Supreme Court of the United States handed down its long-awaited ruling in the case of Google v. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 7:41 am
Law v. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 3:18 am
Circuit, so remand might be useful to reconsider on those grounds as well. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 8:10 am
Case citation: McGhee v. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 7:25 am
Ethicon Ltd [1975] AC 396. [2] Campus Oil v Minister for Industry [1983] IR 38. [3] Okunade v. [read post]
29 Aug 2009, 7:59 am
Thanks to this post at The Volokh Conspiracy, which is titled "Felons and the Right To Bear Arms," I discovered that late yesterday the North Carolina Supreme Court ruling in Britt v. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 1:26 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Vermont. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 6:27 am
Among them are Curtis Publishing Co. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 9:54 am
Nor does Travel Ban fatigue stop them from unpacking all the details in Trump v. [read post]
7 Oct 2012, 10:36 am
Plaintiffs in the Rodarmel v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 12:09 pm
Rick Kittel and KU Defender Project student Kendra Oakes won in State v. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 6:00 am
Supreme Court’s South Dakota v. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 6:00 am
Supreme Court’s South Dakota v. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 4:54 am
Despite all of this and despite the presumed lens through which Wypijewski walked into the courtroom in the trial of The People of the State of New York v. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 6:02 pm
R. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 8:41 pm
For a wonderful analysis of what the Court did and did not do in Stevens, be sure to catch Matthew Liebman’s post on the Animal Legal Defense Fund Blog, Clarifying the Supreme Court’s United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 2:23 pm
(Yeah, Gamso, you've made this point before, too.)In Kansas v. [read post]
