Search for: "U.S. Marshals" Results 5401 - 5420 of 6,558
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2019, 7:04 am by Edith Roberts
” The author of this book review clerked for Ginsburg from 1989-1990 on the U.S. [read post]
16 May 2013, 11:15 am by Ritika Singh
Javid Ahmad of the German Marshall Fund of the United States discusses in the Times whether India should provide direct military assistance to Afghanistan. [read post]
7 Jul 2007, 9:35 am
In many circumstances, to adapt Marshall McLuhan, the "envelope" is the "content. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 3:58 am by Matthew Dresden
Chinese courts are known for being reluctant to issue injunctions because they don’t have the same enforcement power as U.S. courts (China has no equivalent of the U.S. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 11:32 am by Joseph D. Kearney
The land north of Madison (see another such map, id. at 392) was projected for development when the U.S. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 4:45 pm by Kenneth Anderson
” (citation omitted)); see also Sosa, 542 U.S. at 720 (“ ‘[O]ffences against this law of nations are principally incident to whole states or nations,’ and not individuals seeking relief in court. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 3:46 pm by Eugene Volokh
Borough of Middletown, 429 U.S. 964 (1976) (Marshall, J., dissenting) ("The freedom to leave one's house and move about at will is of the very essence of a scheme of ordered liberty, … and hence is protected against state intrusions by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. [read post]
12 Jul 2024, 6:00 am by Michelle
The suggestion of remand to the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation from U.S. [read post]
7 Oct 2024, 4:32 am by Curtis Bradley
" As I state in the Conclusion of my book: As this book has shown, much of the U.S. constitutional law of foreign affairs has been worked out through historic governmental practice. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 10:33 pm
Plaintiffs' Legal Committee, No. 98-1768 (U.S., filed Sept. 13, 2000). [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 5:42 am by Marty Lederman
 The vote (which I should have included in my original post) was 4-3 to grant, with Justice Harlan voting to hold (presumably for the Court's decision in Gillette), and Justice Marshall recused. [read post]